2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/1048257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Dog Erythrocyte Antigens 1, 4, and 7 in Podenco Ibicenco (Ibizan Hounds) from Ibiza Island

Abstract: The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of Dog Erythrocyte Antigens (DEA) 1, 4, and 7 in Ibizan hounds, to compare the results with the prevalence of DEA in Spanish greyhounds, and to determine the risk of sensitization following the first transfusion of blood not typed for DEA 1 and the probability of an acute hemolytic reaction following a second incompatible transfusion using untyped DEA 1 blood. DEA 1, 4, and 7 status was determined in 92 Ibizan hounds. Results were compared with the previou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
20
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data collected from the website DbD has been organized as follows:The prevalence of DEA 1 negative and positive types in the total population and in breeds that showed a substantial number of subjects registered (over 50) was calculated.The breeds numbering over 50 subjects was subtyped as females and males and the prevalence of DEA 1 was calculated according to sex.In the breeds numbering over 50 subjects the percentage of the breed's population was determined in relation to the total Italian canine population inferred from the last 10 years of registration at the ENCI (Ente Nazionale di Cinofilia Italiana, Italian National Kennel Club) (http://www.enci.it) which was calculated.The data concerning the provenience and corresponding blood type of the 7,414 dogs was subdivided into different geographical regions of Italy.Using the standard inclusion criteria for canine blood donors (dogs heavier than 25 kg and aged between 2 and 8 years) and breeds numbering over 20 subjects were considered as prospective “blood donors” regardless of whether they were DEA 1 positive or negative.The risk of sensitization for each breed (over 50 subjects) was calculated using the formula [(% DEA 1 negative ×  % DEA 1 positive)/100] to establish the probability of a dog to become sensitized after the first transfusion of blood without having been tested with a cross-match and typed for DEA 1 [28, 30, 31]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data collected from the website DbD has been organized as follows:The prevalence of DEA 1 negative and positive types in the total population and in breeds that showed a substantial number of subjects registered (over 50) was calculated.The breeds numbering over 50 subjects was subtyped as females and males and the prevalence of DEA 1 was calculated according to sex.In the breeds numbering over 50 subjects the percentage of the breed's population was determined in relation to the total Italian canine population inferred from the last 10 years of registration at the ENCI (Ente Nazionale di Cinofilia Italiana, Italian National Kennel Club) (http://www.enci.it) which was calculated.The data concerning the provenience and corresponding blood type of the 7,414 dogs was subdivided into different geographical regions of Italy.Using the standard inclusion criteria for canine blood donors (dogs heavier than 25 kg and aged between 2 and 8 years) and breeds numbering over 20 subjects were considered as prospective “blood donors” regardless of whether they were DEA 1 positive or negative.The risk of sensitization for each breed (over 50 subjects) was calculated using the formula [(% DEA 1 negative ×  % DEA 1 positive)/100] to establish the probability of a dog to become sensitized after the first transfusion of blood without having been tested with a cross-match and typed for DEA 1 [28, 30, 31]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood typing methods have evolved from tube and card tests to immunochromatographic strip, cartridge, and flow cytometry assays, but additional typing kits for other blood types would be desirable (1,(21)(22)(23)(24). Several limited surveys have been performed for DEA 1, and a few have assessed other blood types in North America and Europe (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35), but there have been no comprehensive surveys carried out on a canine population typing for many blood groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DEA 1 is the most studied blood type. The prevalence of DEA 1-positive dogs varies both geographically and among breeds from 100% to <10%, but has been estimated at ~50% overall internationally (Giger et al, 1995;Novais et al, 1999;Hale et al, 2008;Iazbik et al, 2010;Sinnott Esteve et al, 2011;Ergul Ekiz et al, 2011;Spada et al, 2015aSpada et al, , 2015bSpada et al, , 2016cEuler et al, 2016). DEA 1 is the most antigenic blood type for which naturally occurring antibodies do not exist (Giger et al, 1995;Hale and Wefelmann, 2006;Blais et al, 2009;Euler et al, 2016) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%