2012
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of esophageal atresia among 18 international birth defects surveillance programs

Abstract: BACKGROUND-The prevalence of esophageal atresia (EA) has been shown to vary across different geographical settings. Investigation of geographical differences may provide an insight into the underlying etiology of EA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
96
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The aetiology is still unknown but environmental and/or genetic factors have been suggested [1][2][3]. The epidemiology of EA has been shown to vary in reported series with prevalence raging from 1:2500 to 1:4500 live births [1][2][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The most frequently encountered variant (75-90% of cases) is EA with distal TEF, type C according to Gross classification [1,7,10,[11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aetiology is still unknown but environmental and/or genetic factors have been suggested [1][2][3]. The epidemiology of EA has been shown to vary in reported series with prevalence raging from 1:2500 to 1:4500 live births [1][2][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. The most frequently encountered variant (75-90% of cases) is EA with distal TEF, type C according to Gross classification [1,7,10,[11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aetiology is still unknown but environmental and/or genetic factors have been suggested [1][2][3]. The epidemiology of EA has been shown to vary in reported series with prevalence raging from 1:2500 to 1:4500 live births [1][2][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 International prevalence rates of EA/TEF currently range between 1.27 and 4.55 per 10,000 births. [2][3][4] Due to the complex nature and infrequency of cases, EA/TEF management remains a major therapeutic challenge for most pediatric surgeons and other involved specialists. 5,6 In most of the current reports, prematurity, low birth weight, and additional congenital anomalies are associated with higher mortality and further complicate the care of these patients, 7,8 whereas survival rates in full-term infants with no other abnormalities can approach 100% after EA/TEF surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It affects 1:4,220 live births (Nassar et al, 2012). Its mode of inheritance and pathophysiology are complex (Jacobs et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%