“…1,[9][10][11][12][13][14] Of these 34 studies, 16 were identified in which: 1) the method of case ascertainment involved either neurological examination of all subjects in a population sample or administration of a screening questionnaire followed by neurological examination, and the sensitivity of the screen was provided, and 2) estimates of prevalence were provided within age strata. 5,6,11,12,14,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Of these 16, 5,6,11,12,14,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] 12 used diagnostic criteria for ET that are not ideally suited to epidemiological investigations (e.g., the Consensus Statement of the Movement Disorder Society 27 ) because they do not sufficiently separate ET from other entities such as enhanced physiological tremor, and/or used non-neurologists to assign ET diagnoses, which is not optimal. Four studies remained; these were conducted in Israel, 18 Turkey, 5,20 and Spain.…”