2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2012.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Fabry Disease in Young Patients with Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of our cohort is larger than the sum of 3 previous Fabry studies targeting cryptogenic events, 18,19,21 resulting in a more precise prevalence estimate. Our study provides some insight on the overall prognosis of young patients with a cryptogenic IS, which accounts for one third of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The size of our cohort is larger than the sum of 3 previous Fabry studies targeting cryptogenic events, 18,19,21 resulting in a more precise prevalence estimate. Our study provides some insight on the overall prognosis of young patients with a cryptogenic IS, which accounts for one third of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The very low prevalence we found is consistent with most previous studies based on various designs (Table 4). [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Two smaller North American studies 17,18 and most European studies [19][20][21][22][23][24] identified Fabry in 0.0% to 1.0% of cryptogenic IS or diverse other cerebrovascular conditions. Only 3 European studies reported a prevalence >1.0% in cryptogenic IS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous hypotheses about FD prevalence in the cryptogenic (undetermined) young stroke cohort 32 could not be supported by several subsequent studies (Table 1). 14,15,[32][33][34][35][36][37][38] Therefore, a regular FD screening tool remains out of reach. Three screening studies did not identify any patients with FD, 33,35,36 but others have reported FD in 0.5% to 3.9% of the stroke population.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Fd In Patients With Ischemic Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three screening studies did not identify any patients with FD, 33,35,36 but others have reported FD in 0.5% to 3.9% of the stroke population. 14,15,32,34,37,38 This variation in reported prevalence may be because of differences in the studied stroke populations (age and sex ratios), the stroke types studied, and the diagnosis of FD. Some studies investigated ischemic stroke, whereas others included hemorrhagic stroke, which may have underestimated the prevalence of FD.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Fd In Patients With Ischemic Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bekri et al 2005;Spada et al 2006;Brouns et al 2007;Lin et al 2009;Wallin et al 2011;Dubuc et al 2012;Mechtler et al 2012). These screening studies have revealed a high number of individuals with variants in the GLA gene (Kobayashi et al 2012;Terryn et al 2013;van der Tol et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%