2014
DOI: 10.9790/0853-131147683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of female genital mutilation among school girls in ElMansoura Center, El-Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the odds of a girl undergoing the procedure are twice among rural compared to urban residents (OR; 2.456, 95% CI=1.595 -2.844). This is also in agreement with previous evidence [11,17,[23][24][25] . This may be because of the strict tradition and loose legal concern for the practice in the rural areas.…”
Section:  Residencesupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the odds of a girl undergoing the procedure are twice among rural compared to urban residents (OR; 2.456, 95% CI=1.595 -2.844). This is also in agreement with previous evidence [11,17,[23][24][25] . This may be because of the strict tradition and loose legal concern for the practice in the rural areas.…”
Section:  Residencesupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The current study demonstrated that the prevalence of FGM\C among early adolescent girls aged (10 to 14) years was (64.8%), which indicates a decline in the practice of FGM/C in Egypt. This is in agreement with another study that was conducted in El-Dakahlia governorate among secondary school girls which found that the prevalence of FGM/C among them was (53.7%) [11] . Also this is in agreement with the earlier report by El-Gibaly et al [12] who showed that approximately (84.2%) of girls in Egypt would be circumcised, which was lower than practice levels in the ninetieth.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Fgm\csupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The psychological consequences of female circumcision can be explained by the following mechanisms: a person's concern about the state of their genitals, future married life, and fear of infertility, or when circumcision was delayed until adolescence or early adulthood due to parental weakness or as a sort of punishment. 34 On the other hand, the education provided in schools and public forums about the negative effects of circumcision puts a lot of psychological pressure on circumcised individuals. 35 Some researchers also believe that cultural acceptance of circumcision can reduce its psychological burden.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inactive local communities' involvement and its stumpy participation by rural people in controlling FGM risk lead to feeble decision-making, which support to suspended the lives of thousands and millions of women [15]. communities objective was to guarantee females purity and virginity which taken as precondition for an honorable marriage and basis of economic survival for women [16,17]. [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%