2014
DOI: 10.5455/jva.20141118035212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Helminths of Dogs : A Retrospective Study.

Abstract: A total of six hundred and eighty (680) cases of dogs visiting the Abia state veterinary clinic were examined to investigate the influence of age, breed, sex, and season on the prevalence of gastro intestinal helminth parasites (GIHP) of dogs from 2007-2012. It was observed from the results that out of six hundred and eighty (680) cases recorded, the prevalence of GIHP were. Ancylostoma 217 (31.9%) Toxocara 81, (11.9%) tape worm 36 (5.2%). The age of the dogs significantly influenced the occurrence of Ancylost… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the higher prevalence rates recorded in male dogs could be attributed to far distance wandering habits of male dogs in search of food and mating mates that might expose them to infective stages and intermediate host of the helminths compared to the females. This is consistent with the result of a previous study (Moro and Abah, 2019;Khan et al, 2020), but in contrasts to the findings of Onyeabor (2014), Iboh et al (2015) and Jajere et al (2022) who have reported higher prevalence in female than the male dogs. This present study revealed a significant higher prevalence of helminths infection in young compared to adult dogs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the higher prevalence rates recorded in male dogs could be attributed to far distance wandering habits of male dogs in search of food and mating mates that might expose them to infective stages and intermediate host of the helminths compared to the females. This is consistent with the result of a previous study (Moro and Abah, 2019;Khan et al, 2020), but in contrasts to the findings of Onyeabor (2014), Iboh et al (2015) and Jajere et al (2022) who have reported higher prevalence in female than the male dogs. This present study revealed a significant higher prevalence of helminths infection in young compared to adult dogs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The overall prevalence rate of 84.5% gastrointestinal helminths infection in dogs recorded in the present study is considerably high, which could be due to allowing domesticated dogs to breed with infected stray dogs and favorable ecological conditions for helminths life cycle proliferation. Comparatively with previous studies from some parts of Nigeria, our finding was higher than 56.1% reported from Enugu (Idika et al, 2017), 65.0% from Abua (Moro and Abah, 2019), 39.1 from Bende (Amadi et al, 2021), and 77.9% from Gombe (Jajere et al, 2022), however, lower than 81.3% reported from Abia (Onyeabor, 2014). Variations in the prevalence rates of gastrointestinal helminths in dogs reported from different parts of the country could be attributed to differences in climatic conditions, ecological difference and diagnostic techniques used in each study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…The prevalence was relatively higher than 5.9% found by Pullola et al [15] in Finland. However, it was lower than 75.26% reported by Abere et al [14] The prevalence of Ancylostoma spp (32.3%) was comparable to 31.9% reported by Onyeabor [21] in Nigeria. However, it was higher than 3.8% found by Ilić et al [16] in Serbia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…However, Babamale et al (2018) and Omonijo & Sowemimo (2017) recorded a higher prevalence of 81.4% and 85% in Kwara and Ekiti States in Nigeria respectively. The high prevalence of gastrointestinal and ectoparasite recorded in this study could also be attributable to high environmental contamination which poses a high risk for the dogs since most of the dogs roam the communities scavenging for food (Onyeabor, 2014;Ayinmode et al, 2016). The close bonds of these animals with their owners as recorded in this study present risk of zoonotic infections for the dog owners and other inhabitants of these communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%