2018
DOI: 10.1097/olq.0000000000000691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Testing by Anatomical Site Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in HIV Medical Care, United States, 2013–2014

Abstract: Fewer than one-third of men who have sex with men were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Chlamydia trachomatis as part of HIV medical care in the United States in 2013 to 2014, and only 11.6% were tested for either sexually transmitted disease at an extragenital site.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HIV-infected individuals had approximately 75% lower odds of receiving repeat testing following an inconclusive result compared to HIV-uninfected individuals. These results parallel previous literature describing suboptimal GC/CT screening among HIV-infected persons, with annual GC/CT screening rates for at least one anatomical site estimated at 20–39% [1214] and even lower estimated rates for rectal GC/CT screening at 9% [15]. These findings are particularly concerning as HIV-infected individuals are disproportionately affected by the current bacterial STI epidemic compared to those not living with HIV [1], highlighting the continued need for improved screening efforts to facilitate timely treatment and prevention of STI transmission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…HIV-infected individuals had approximately 75% lower odds of receiving repeat testing following an inconclusive result compared to HIV-uninfected individuals. These results parallel previous literature describing suboptimal GC/CT screening among HIV-infected persons, with annual GC/CT screening rates for at least one anatomical site estimated at 20–39% [1214] and even lower estimated rates for rectal GC/CT screening at 9% [15]. These findings are particularly concerning as HIV-infected individuals are disproportionately affected by the current bacterial STI epidemic compared to those not living with HIV [1], highlighting the continued need for improved screening efforts to facilitate timely treatment and prevention of STI transmission.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This value was derived from a previous model-based estimate of the national annual screening rate for MSM. 39s Men then had a 38% independent probability of also being screened at each of the rectal or pharyngeal sites, 10 , 11 , 15 ,40s,41s which translated into an approximate 23% probability of being screened at only the rectal site or only the pharyngeal site and a 14% probability of being screened at both sites in addition to urogenital screening. Asymptomatic patients received the standard level of care, which involved registering at the clinic upon arrival, consulting with a provider, undergoing a physical examination with sample collection by a provider, and counseling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymptomatic infections may serve as transmission reservoirs, 3 , 7 10 yet levels of extragenital asymptomatic screening are likely lower than recommended. 10 15 Potential explanations for this include provider time constraints and discomfort with taking sexual risk histories. 16 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, comorbidities are common among STD pathogens. For instance, epididymitis, which causes pain and swelling almost always unilateral, can be accompanied by inflammation in the testes, especially viral orchitis (7,8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%