2015
DOI: 10.2138/am-2015-4809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of growth twins among anhedral plagioclase microlites

Abstract: Crystal textures of volcanic rocks record the processes involved in magma storage and eruptive ascent. Syn-eruptive crystallization, in which groundmass crystals form and grow according to environmental factors such as thermodynamic undercooling, strongly influences the texture of erupted magma. This stage is difficult to isolate for study in natural rocks, but well-suited for laboratory experiments because the chemical compositions and crystallization timescales of eruptive processes can be emulated. This stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter may be an artifact of the imaging process, reflecting magnification scales too high to capture statistically meaningful numbers of the largest crystals; it may also record a lack of late nucleation. Overturns at small size classes have been variously attributed to ripening (e.g., Higgins & Roberge 2003;Pupier et al, 2008), under-compensation for intersection probability (e.g., Brugger & Hammer 2010b), or insufficient resolution (e.g., Cashman & Ferry 1988;Hammer et al 1999), although our image resolution is more than adequate to capture crystals >1 µm in length. The most pronounced feature of our size distributions is, however, their curvature, which has been ascribed to a plethora of natural processes in the volcanological literature (e.g., magma mixing, crystal accumulation, textural coarsening, two-stage crystallization, or accelerating nucleation and growth; Marsh 1988;Armienti et al 1994;Higgins 1998;Bindeman 2003;Higgins & Roberge 2003;Shea et al 2010a), or to artifacts produced by the 2D-3D conversion because of variations in crystal shape (Castro et al 2004).…”
Section: Crystal Size Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter may be an artifact of the imaging process, reflecting magnification scales too high to capture statistically meaningful numbers of the largest crystals; it may also record a lack of late nucleation. Overturns at small size classes have been variously attributed to ripening (e.g., Higgins & Roberge 2003;Pupier et al, 2008), under-compensation for intersection probability (e.g., Brugger & Hammer 2010b), or insufficient resolution (e.g., Cashman & Ferry 1988;Hammer et al 1999), although our image resolution is more than adequate to capture crystals >1 µm in length. The most pronounced feature of our size distributions is, however, their curvature, which has been ascribed to a plethora of natural processes in the volcanological literature (e.g., magma mixing, crystal accumulation, textural coarsening, two-stage crystallization, or accelerating nucleation and growth; Marsh 1988;Armienti et al 1994;Higgins 1998;Bindeman 2003;Higgins & Roberge 2003;Shea et al 2010a), or to artifacts produced by the 2D-3D conversion because of variations in crystal shape (Castro et al 2004).…”
Section: Crystal Size Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In particular, choices of characteristic crystal length L vary considerably (e.g., major axis length, caliper length, crystal width, square root of crystal area), as do approaches to stereological conversion (Peterson, 1996;Sahagian & Proussevitch, 1998;Higgins, 2000). Following Brugger & Hammer (2010b), we adopt methods and assumptions that have been widely used in recent textural studies of igneous systems. Our aim is to facilitate comparison of our experimental results with past (and future) datasets.…”
Section: Textural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large lattice mismatches, and associated energy penalties, generated by heterogeneous nucleation may drive the detachment of a poorly orientated unit, followed by reattachment in a more-favorable orientation (Buerger, 1945). In certain cases, it may even be more energetically favorable for the components of the misaligned daughter crystal to remain in the liquid state (Brugger and Hammer, 2015).…”
Section: Crystal Growth Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FeNiCo charges were prepared for EBSD analysis by light polishing to remove the carbon coat, followed by ultra-fine polishing using colloidal silica on a VibroMet ™ vibrating polisher. For EBSD measurements, the SEM was operated at low vacuum (11 Pa) with 20 kV accelerating voltage and 5 nA beam current and 70° tilted stage (Brugger and Hammer, 2015). Five to ten point analyses were conducted on each sample to ensure that single crystals were analyzed.…”
Section: Analytical Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%