2018
DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Head Injury and Associated Disability in Prison Populations: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The wide range in prevalence estimates of HI in prisoners is associated with high risk of bias from study design and methods. Persisting disability associated with HI was not reported and as a result the service need for prisoners with HI is unclear. Future studies should indicate that samples are representative of prison populations, use validated tools and internationally accepted definitions of HI, and link prevalence to persisting disability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These meta-analyses comprise studies that are entirely based on self-report where lifetime prevalence ranges from 10 to 100% in adults. The meta-analyses do not use quality ratings and the individual studies are subject to methodological bias in relation to lifetime prevalence estimates [9]. The accuracy of self-report or of records of hospitalisation as a true estimate of lifetime prevalence remains an issue [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These meta-analyses comprise studies that are entirely based on self-report where lifetime prevalence ranges from 10 to 100% in adults. The meta-analyses do not use quality ratings and the individual studies are subject to methodological bias in relation to lifetime prevalence estimates [9]. The accuracy of self-report or of records of hospitalisation as a true estimate of lifetime prevalence remains an issue [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this pattern is replicated in prison populations, then the estimates of a high lifetime prevalence of HI in prisoners could lead to a considerable over-statement of health service need. A recent systematic review assessed the risk of methodological bias in prevalence studies on HI in prisoners as being high overall, and highlighted several weaknesses, including that all previous studies are based on self-report of HI, there is little appropriate comparison with non-prisoners, none provide national coverage and in fact, most rely on samples that are not, or are not shown to be, representative of the prison population [9]. The social and economic costs of imprisonment are high, and it has been argued that brain injury in prisoners is likely to make a significant contribution to these costs [10], and that there is a clear need to establish a service pathway for those with persisting effects of HI, and in order to do this effectively, further epidemiological work is needed [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following text word searches were chosen from terms used in relevant published systematic reviews (10,11,15).…”
Section: Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domains were based on a previous systematic review of HI and offending (10) and modified in relation to the review questions (see table 1). These domains were used to organise and synthesise the data across studies.…”
Section: Quality Ratingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation