1997
DOI: 10.1007/s004040050138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical tissue. Retrospective analysis of 855 cervical biopsies

Abstract: The histopathologic features of 855 cervical biopsies were correlated with the presence of human papillomavirus DNA using in situ hybridization (ISH) with biotin labeled type specific probes for Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33 and 51. HPV-DNA was found in 18% (13/72) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I (CIN I), 30% (35/115) of CIN II, 28% (57(206) of CIN III, in 84% (21/25) of flat condyloma and in 13% (15/112) of normal cervical tissue. HPV DNA was detectable in 11% (5/46) of cervi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in which biological factors including telomerase activity, p53 expression, proliferation markers, DNA ploidy and the presence of a variety of papillomavirus subtypes have been associated with CIN 1, 2 and 3 are surprisingly sparse, but show no consistent association between, on the one hand, CIN 1 and CIN 2 or, on the other, CIN 2 and CIN 3 for any of the parameters. These findings are reflected in those studies in which the authors chose to retain the dysplasia terminology when classifying their cases 24 –37 …”
Section: How Should We Grade Cin?mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Studies in which biological factors including telomerase activity, p53 expression, proliferation markers, DNA ploidy and the presence of a variety of papillomavirus subtypes have been associated with CIN 1, 2 and 3 are surprisingly sparse, but show no consistent association between, on the one hand, CIN 1 and CIN 2 or, on the other, CIN 2 and CIN 3 for any of the parameters. These findings are reflected in those studies in which the authors chose to retain the dysplasia terminology when classifying their cases 24 –37 …”
Section: How Should We Grade Cin?mentioning
confidence: 91%