2022
DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium infection and macrolide resistance in pregnant women receiving prenatal care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
2
2

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…16,25 Comparatively, vast differences were present in prevalence of MRMs between our retrospective study cohort (1997-2001) compared with the recent prospective study cohort. 22 No MRMs were detected among MG strains in this study's cohort, whereas MRM prevalence was 41% in our more recent Birmingham cohort. 22 A similar cohort of pregnant women seen for routine prenatal care in Houston, TX, in 2018 to 2019 had an MRM prevalence of 31%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…16,25 Comparatively, vast differences were present in prevalence of MRMs between our retrospective study cohort (1997-2001) compared with the recent prospective study cohort. 22 No MRMs were detected among MG strains in this study's cohort, whereas MRM prevalence was 41% in our more recent Birmingham cohort. 22 A similar cohort of pregnant women seen for routine prenatal care in Houston, TX, in 2018 to 2019 had an MRM prevalence of 31%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…22 No MRMs were detected among MG strains in this study's cohort, whereas MRM prevalence was 41% in our more recent Birmingham cohort. 22 A similar cohort of pregnant women seen for routine prenatal care in Houston, TX, in 2018 to 2019 had an MRM prevalence of 31%. 16 The prevalence of MRM in recent studies in nonpregnant women in the United States shows even higher MRM rates of ≥50%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations