2020
DOI: 10.1645/19-116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Infection and Co-Infection and Presence of Rickettsial Endosymbionts in Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) in Connecticut, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrast suggests that B. burgdorferi and A. phagocytophilum should rarely be found as co-infections in the same tick. However, this expectation is contradicted by the study of Pokutnaya et al [81], who reported that female ticks were more likely to be infected with B. burgdorferi if they are also infected with A. phagocytophilum. The interactions among these bacteria are still poorly understood, and it will ultimately also be necessary to determine whether such co-infected ticks have a reduced probability of actually transmitting either A. phagocytophilum or B. burgdorferi.…”
Section: Borrelia Infection Status and Tick Microbiome Diversitymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This contrast suggests that B. burgdorferi and A. phagocytophilum should rarely be found as co-infections in the same tick. However, this expectation is contradicted by the study of Pokutnaya et al [81], who reported that female ticks were more likely to be infected with B. burgdorferi if they are also infected with A. phagocytophilum. The interactions among these bacteria are still poorly understood, and it will ultimately also be necessary to determine whether such co-infected ticks have a reduced probability of actually transmitting either A. phagocytophilum or B. burgdorferi.…”
Section: Borrelia Infection Status and Tick Microbiome Diversitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A variety of studies have shown that the infection status of Ixodes ticks by B. burgdorferi is affected by the presence of other co-circulating pathogens [80][81][82]. Positive associations have been found between B. burgdorferi and Babesia microti [80,81], while mixed positive and negative associations are reported for Anaplasma phagocytophilum [81,82]. This may be explained by differences in the role of the tick peritrophic membrane in facilitating colonization by different bacteria.…”
Section: Borrelia Infection Status and Tick Microbiome Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rickettsia strain Humboldt genome (NZ_LAOP01000001.1) does not appear to contain antibiotic gene clusters similar to those found in R. buchneri , which might be one reason that I. pacificus can be coinfected with both its endosymbiont and potentially pathogenic species. Interestingly, field-collected I. scapularis have occasionally been found containing R. amblyommatis, R. montanensis , or R. parkeri ( 25 , 31 , 36 , 41 , 42 , 44 , 53 , 108 ), which could potentially occur through “spillover” from host feeding alongside infected A. americanum or D. variabilis ; however, these infected I. scapularis appear to be individuals lacking R. buchneri since the endosymbiont was not detected in these ticks. Only one coinfection of I. scapularis with R. buchneri and R. parkeri has been reported ( 44 ), and this was in a blood-fed tick collected from Louisiana black bears ( Ursus americanus luteolus ) also being fed on by R. parkeri- infected A. maculatum , making it likely that the pathogen was present in the infected blood meal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coinfections are commonly observed in natural populations of various species [ 138 , 139 , 140 ]. It has been demonstrated that coinfection can lead to decreased host resistance in nature and laboratory experiments [ 140 , 141 , 142 ], and negatively impact host health [ 139 , 143 ]. These previous findings suggest that avoidance of coinfection would increase host fitness, and support a model in which infection by any pathogen may provoke a generalized prophylactic response against coinfection alongside the specific response to the primary pathogen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%