2019
DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1704409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of low scores on language tests as a potential factor in misdiagnosis of cognitive impairment in a Spanish-speaking adult population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, composite scores were created from the 24 Z-scores for the following domains: learning and memory [5 scores (ROCF Immediate Recall, ROCF Delayed Recall, HVLT-R Total Recall, HVLT-R Delayed Recall, and HVLT-R Recognition)], language [8 scores (Letters F, A, S, M, Animals, Fruits, Professions, and BNT Total)], attention and processing speed [6 scores (TMT A & B, Stroop Color, Stroop Word, SDMT, and BTA)], and executive functions [5 scores (M-WCST Categories, M-WCST Perseverations, M-WCST Total Errors, Stroop Word-Color, and Stroop Interference)] following the classification suggested by (Rivera et al, 2021;D Rivera et al, 2019b) and (Olabarrieta-Landa et al, 2022). Each composite score was created using Stouffer's Z method (Whitlock, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, composite scores were created from the 24 Z-scores for the following domains: learning and memory [5 scores (ROCF Immediate Recall, ROCF Delayed Recall, HVLT-R Total Recall, HVLT-R Delayed Recall, and HVLT-R Recognition)], language [8 scores (Letters F, A, S, M, Animals, Fruits, Professions, and BNT Total)], attention and processing speed [6 scores (TMT A & B, Stroop Color, Stroop Word, SDMT, and BTA)], and executive functions [5 scores (M-WCST Categories, M-WCST Perseverations, M-WCST Total Errors, Stroop Word-Color, and Stroop Interference)] following the classification suggested by (Rivera et al, 2021;D Rivera et al, 2019b) and (Olabarrieta-Landa et al, 2022). Each composite score was created using Stouffer's Z method (Whitlock, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chi-square test was used to compare qualitative variables. Raw scores were converted to percentiles (𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 𝑖𝑖 ) using the normative data published for HVLT-R and ROCF by Rivera et al (2019), for M-WCST, SDMT, TMT, Stroop test by Rivera et al (2020) and BNT, VFT by Olabarrieta-Landa et al (2019). Percentiles (𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 𝑖𝑖 ) were utilized to estimate the number of low scores (base rate low score) at various cut-off percentiles: below the 25 th , 16 th , 10 th , 5 th and 2 nd , in each cognitive domain (learning and memory, language and executive function; see Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While neuropsychologists understand the importance of controlling for pertinent factors such as age and education, other disciplines (i.e., neurology) may be apt to use raw score cutoffs. As the sociodemographic makeup of people living in the United States expands, the onus of responsibility for crossvalidating traditional cognitive measures to populations underrepresented in extant normative data often falls to clinical researchers to reduce risk of incorrect classification of cognitive impairment (Olabarrieta-Landa et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%