2021
DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2021.9417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of multi-drug resistant bacteria associated with foods and drinks in Nigeria (2015-2020): A systematic review

Abstract: Foods are essential vehicles in human exposure to antibiotic resistant bacteria which serve as reservoirs for resistance genes and a rising food safety concern. Antimicrobial resistance, including multidrug resistance (MDR), is an increasing problem globally and poses a serious concern to human health. This study was designed to synthesize data regarding the prevalence of MDR bacteria associated with foods and drinks sold within Nigeria in order to contribute to the existing findings in this area. A comprehens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of bacterial isolates were classified as MDR (231/319, 72.41%). Since food products and environmental aspects have been proposed as sources for transmitting resistance genes [ 32 , 33 , 34 ], findings of MDR bacterial strains in animal food products are a concern and further strengthen these theories [ 33 , 35 , 36 ]. The lowest proportion of MDR bacteria was found in V. cholerae from fish, where almost 45% of isolates were MDR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of bacterial isolates were classified as MDR (231/319, 72.41%). Since food products and environmental aspects have been proposed as sources for transmitting resistance genes [ 32 , 33 , 34 ], findings of MDR bacterial strains in animal food products are a concern and further strengthen these theories [ 33 , 35 , 36 ]. The lowest proportion of MDR bacteria was found in V. cholerae from fish, where almost 45% of isolates were MDR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%