2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of nematodes in Danish industrialized sow farms with loose housed sows in dynamic groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…stimulate only limited immunity, which moderately regulates the intestinal worm burdens (Roepstorff and Nansen 1994). Thus, as observed in this study, sows had the highest worm burdens and similar observations have been reported in other studies (Tamboura et al 2006;Haugegaard 2010). Effective control strategies against this worm should be targeted towards sows since they are kept for several years on a farm (Kagira et al 2010) and may act as source of infection for piglets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…stimulate only limited immunity, which moderately regulates the intestinal worm burdens (Roepstorff and Nansen 1994). Thus, as observed in this study, sows had the highest worm burdens and similar observations have been reported in other studies (Tamboura et al 2006;Haugegaard 2010). Effective control strategies against this worm should be targeted towards sows since they are kept for several years on a farm (Kagira et al 2010) and may act as source of infection for piglets.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The recorded occurrence of the six nematode species was higher than that reported in indoor kept pigs in Kenya (Kagira et al 2008) and Scandinavian countries (Haugegaard 2010) but was close to that reported in semi-intensively kept pigs 2,000-2,900 31 (10%) 22 (7%) 3 (1%) 5 (2%) 0 (0%) 1 (<1%) 3,000-3,900 8(3%) 8 (3%) 5 (2%) 1 (<1%) 0 (0%) 0 (%) 4,000-4,900 15 (5%) 8 (3%) 4 (1%) 0 (0%) 2 (1%) 0 (0%) 5,000 and more 30 (10%) 6 (2%) 13 (4%) 1 (<1%) 2 (1%) 0 (0%) in Uganda (Nissen et al 2011). This can be attributed to the higher risk of parasite infection in pigs kept under the traditional system where animals are often kept tethered or allowed to scavenge for feed in environments that may be contaminated with parasite eggs and larva.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…within these herds (Haugegaard, 2010) and an outbreak of strongyloidiosis has been observed (Haugegaard, personal communication). If this partly anecdotal evidence holds true, then the only means left for helminth control in the modern production units with a higher level of animal welfare, is regular drug treatment.…”
Section: Helminth Challenges In Relation To New Trends In Indoor Pig mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such losses are incurred as a result of: low growth rates, compromised alimentary conversion the animals, increased susceptibility to secondary infections, and increased quantity of condemned flesh at time of slaughter (Haugegaard 2010;Lai et al 2011). Among these parasites, gastrointestinal helminthes are far more prevalent than any other group, being represented by the genera Ascaris, Oesophagostomum, Strongyloides, Trichuris, and Metastrongylus spp., each having a specific geographical area of prevalence (Boes et al 2000;Haugegaard 2010;Lai et al 2011). Nematodes of the genus Oesophagostomum have a worldwide distribution, with principal etiological species infecting pigs being Oesophagostomum dentatum and Oesophagostomum quadrispinulatum (Lin et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nematodes of the genus Oesophagostomum have a worldwide distribution, with principal etiological species infecting pigs being Oesophagostomum dentatum and Oesophagostomum quadrispinulatum (Lin et al 2008). In Denmark, Haugegaard (2010) reported that in a study conducted on 79 farms, 15% were infected with Oesophagostomum spp., and in some farms, the prevalence rate for this nematode has reached 50%. The mode of infection is principally characterized by oral ingestion of infectious larvae (L 3 ) found in contaminated environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%