2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Neospora caninum infection in Australian (NSW) dairy cattle estimated by a newly validated ELISA for milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
12
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been a number of individual herd investigations for neosporosis reported in dairy herds in New South Wales (NSW), with seroprevalences around 10–11% (ELISA) in two of the herds and 24% (indirect‐fluorescent antibody test: IFAT) in a third herd. A study of NSW dairy cattle using a milk ELISA found 21% prevalence of N. caninum antibodies in 398 cows sampled from 203 farms, with one or more positive animals in 35% of the farms sampled . However, until our study was undertaken, there had not been a statistically designed survey of neosporosis in NSW beef herds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There have been a number of individual herd investigations for neosporosis reported in dairy herds in New South Wales (NSW), with seroprevalences around 10–11% (ELISA) in two of the herds and 24% (indirect‐fluorescent antibody test: IFAT) in a third herd. A study of NSW dairy cattle using a milk ELISA found 21% prevalence of N. caninum antibodies in 398 cows sampled from 203 farms, with one or more positive animals in 35% of the farms sampled . However, until our study was undertaken, there had not been a statistically designed survey of neosporosis in NSW beef herds.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, in a comparative study carried out by Bartels et al (2006), seroprevalences on European dairy farms ranged between 0.5% in Sweden and 16.2% in Spain. Prevalences have been estimated at between 14.1 and 40.4% in America (Paré et al 1996;Chi et al 2002;Moore 2005), 5.7-35.6% in Asia (Hur et al 1998;Koiwai et al 2005) and 6.0-21.1% in Oceania (Reichel 1998;Hall et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hall et al (2006) validated this Idv ELISA for detection of N. caninum antibodies in bovine milk, optimizing cut-off values by TG-ROC analysis and obtained a 97% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. In the present study serum and milk samples were tested by the same method, Idv ELISA, but in the study of Hall et al (2006) cut-off determination for milk Idv ELISA was made in relation to serum samples tested by an Idx ELISA. Difference in method used for testing reference serum samples might explain the different optimized cut-off values reported for Idv ELISA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In previous studies conducted in different regions of the world several ELISAs were adapted for detection of Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle using individual milk samples (Björkman et al 1996, Schares et al 2004, Hall et al 2006, bulk milk samples (Bartels et al 2005, Frossling et al 2006, Wapenaar et al 2007 or both (González-Warleta et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%