Prevalence of Nontyphoidal Salmonella and Salmonella Strains with Conjugative Antimicrobial-Resistant Serovars Contaminating Animal Feed in Texas

Hsieh, Yi-Cheng; Poole, Toni L.; Runyon, Mick; Hume, Michael E.; Herrman, Timothy J.

doi:10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-163

Cited by 10 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Numerous Salmonella spp. isolation and characterization survey studies have been conducted over the years on a wide range of feeds and feed mills (38,39,(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60)(61). Collectively, these surveys have revealed that Salmonella spp.…”

Section: Biological Contamination Of Feedsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, of the 12.5% confirmed positive Salmonella samples, S. Senftenberg and S. Montevideo were the most prevalent serovars identified (57). In a survey of Texas ready-to-eat and animal feed byproducts, Hsieh et al (58) reported that fish meal had the highest prevalence of Salmonella spp. followed by animal proteins with S. Mbanka and S. Montevideo being the most frequent serovars identified.…”

Section: Biological Contamination Of Feedsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Montevideo were the most prevalent serovars identified ( 57 ). In a survey of Texas ready-to-eat and animal feed byproducts, Hsieh et al ( 58 ) reported that fish meal had the highest prevalence of Salmonella spp. followed by animal proteins with S .…”

Section: Biological Contamination Of Feedsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Consequently, several studies have indicated that level of Salmonella spp. recovered from animal byproducts may differ compared to their plant-based counterparts ( 39 , 45 , 58 , 59 , 110 – 112 ). However, some of these differences in response to acids, such as formate, may be related to serovar survival differences in feed and temperature of feed treatment ( 19 , 113 , 114 ).…”

Section: Formic Acid and Antimicrobial Activities In Animal Feedsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Formic Acid as an Antimicrobial for Poultry Production: A Review

Ricke

Dittoe

Richardson³

2020

Front. Vet. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Organic acids continue to receive considerable attention as feed additives for animal production. Most of the emphasis to date has focused on food safety aspects, particularly on lowering the incidence of foodborne pathogens in poultry and other livestock. Several organic acids are currently either being examined or are already being implemented in commercial settings. Among the several organic acids that have been studied extensively, is formic acid. Formic acid has been added to poultry diets as a means to limit Salmonella spp. and other foodborne pathogens both in the feed and potentially in the gastrointestinal tract once consumed. As more becomes known about the efficacy and impact formic acid has on both the host and foodborne pathogens, it is clear that the presence of formic acid can trigger certain pathways in Salmonella spp. This response may become more complex when formic acid enters the gastrointestinal tract and interacts not only with Salmonella spp. that has colonized the gastrointestinal tract but the indigenous microbial community as well. This review will cover current findings and prospects for further research on the poultry microbiome and feeds treated with formic acid.

show abstract

Section: Biological Contamination Of Feedsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Biological Contamination Of Feedsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Biological Contamination Of Feedsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Formic Acid and Antimicrobial Activities In Animal Feedsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Formic Acid as an Antimicrobial for Poultry Production: A Review

Ricke

Dittoe

Richardson³

2020

Front. Vet. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2013; Hsieh et al . 2016). Nevertheless, the assessment on intervention strategies might be only applicable where the studies were conducted (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Potential risk‐factors affectingSalmonellasp. andEscherichia colioccurrence and distribution in Midwestern United States swine feed mills

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim This study aimed to evaluate the patterns and potential risk factors associated with the occurrence of Salmonella sp. and Escherichia coli in selected United States swine feed mills. Methods and Results A total of 405 samples were collected during fall 2018, spring and summer 2019 from selected sites including floors, equipment, shoes and feed in six feed mills in the US Midwest region. Each sample was analysed for the presence of Salmonella and E. coli with culture methods and confirmed by PCR. A survey regarding production volumes, hygiene practices and microbial testing capabilities was conducted in each facility All mills had at least one sampling site positive for either Salmonella or E. coli. Of the 405 samples, 4·7, and 14·1% were positive for Salmonella sp., and E. coli respectively. Sites with higher percentages of positive samples were the receiving, manufacturing, and control area floors. The survey responses indicated that the age of the mill might be a risk factor for bacterial contamination: the older the facility, the higher the number of positive samples. Other risk factors evaluated, such as the production capacity, did not appear to relate to bacterial prevalence. Conclusion The data documents the presence of E. coli and Salmonella in selected US swine feed mills, and an association between E. coli occurrence and number of ingredient suppliers to feed mill. Significance and Impact of the Study This information could be used to understand risk factors affecting the occurrence of Salmonella sp. and E. coli in feed mills and help implement monitoring and mitigation strategies for public health.

show abstract