1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1073-8746(98)80015-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of orthodontic asymmetries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
40
0
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
40
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the presence of midline deviation, a 37% incidence was found which indicates, according to researchers, the probable presence of some masticatory alteration. 19,20 On the topic of facial typology (mesofacial, dolichofacial and brachyfacial), a prevalence of 57% of the mesofacial type can be observed, which was expected as this type is prevalent in the Brazilian population. 21 The dolichofacial type presented in 39% of the sample; studies were found in the literature which report that dolichofacial patients are the most likely to develop mouth-breathing, as they have nasal and nasopharyngeal structures that are narrower than those of patients of the other facial types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Regarding the presence of midline deviation, a 37% incidence was found which indicates, according to researchers, the probable presence of some masticatory alteration. 19,20 On the topic of facial typology (mesofacial, dolichofacial and brachyfacial), a prevalence of 57% of the mesofacial type can be observed, which was expected as this type is prevalent in the Brazilian population. 21 The dolichofacial type presented in 39% of the sample; studies were found in the literature which report that dolichofacial patients are the most likely to develop mouth-breathing, as they have nasal and nasopharyngeal structures that are narrower than those of patients of the other facial types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…12 In a population of North American adolescents, analysis of orthodontic records revealed facial asymmetry and dental midline deviation in 12% and 21% of those studied, respectively. 13 The marked difference in the prevalence of facial asymmetry between the two populations is probably due to selection bias in studies involving populations referred for treatment, with overestimation of the occurrence of facial asymmetry in the American population. Unfortunately, no studies conducted on the Brazilian population are available for comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,20 There are increasing numbers of Class III patients undergoing orthognathic surgery; therefore, it is of critical importance to assess asymmetry accurately in these patients. For this reason, groups 2 through 4 included skeletal Class III patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%