2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07464-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of otic capsule dehiscence in temporal bone computed tomography scan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, other OCD variants than SSCD are far from being systematically searched for in the current radiological practice, despite the obvious presence of a TMWS. This can be easily explained because most of the articles communicated or published in the past 20 years have almost exclusively focused on SSCD, although the incidence of these OCD variants is not necessarily lower ( 13 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, other OCD variants than SSCD are far from being systematically searched for in the current radiological practice, despite the obvious presence of a TMWS. This can be easily explained because most of the articles communicated or published in the past 20 years have almost exclusively focused on SSCD, although the incidence of these OCD variants is not necessarily lower ( 13 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the largest radiographic series to date, Motasaddi Zarandy et al evaluated 600 patients using CT scans of all planes and required the dehiscence to be present on at least two consecutive images. 11 They found a CFD rate of 6.3%. The lower incidence in this evaluation may be from requiring the dehiscence to span at least two sections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The lower incidence in this evaluation may be from requiring the dehiscence to span at least two sections. 11 The only histologic study to date demonstrates a lower incidence for CFD when compared with imaging studies. A review of more than 1,000 temporal bone specimens identified an anatomical dehiscence rate of 0.59% but found 35% of patients had a thin enough bony partition of 0.1 mm to appear dehiscent on CT images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2016, Wackym et al coined the term "otic capsule syndrome" to define the existence of associated dehiscences between any of the semicircular canals (superior, posterior or lateral) [ 14 ], and in 2020, Whyte et al expanded this term to include multiple other dehiscences of structures derived from the otic capsule, such as the tegmen tympani, mastoid antrum, posterior semicircular canal, internal auditory canal or Fallopian aqueduct [ 15 ]. In 2023, Zarandy et al studied the different types of dehiscences of the otic capsule and found a 6 and 2.7% prevalence of dehiscences of the superior and posterior semicircular canals, respectively; that of cochlear–facial dehiscence was 6.3%, that of the cochlea with the auditory canal was 0.7%, that of the cochlea with the carotid canal was 0.7%, that of dehiscence of the jugular bulb and aqueduct was 6.3% and that of the jugular bulb with the posterior semicircular canal was 0.2% [ 16 ]. When analysing this information, we found no mention of the link between tegmen dehiscence and superior semicircular canal dehiscence, despite this being the most prevalent presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%