2022
DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.14040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of psychoactive drugs in injured patients presenting to an emergency department

Abstract: Objective The aim of the present study was to obtain an unbiased understanding of the prevalence of psychoactive drugs in trauma patients presenting to a large ED. Methods Consecutive adult patients presenting to the ED with an injury resulting in a trauma call had an anonymised, additional blood test taken for detection of over 2000 drugs. Laboratory testing was to judicial standards. Drugs given by ambulance pre‐hospital were detected but excluded from the analysis. Results Over 6 months 276 (74.7%) of 371 p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, urine drug screens were limited to six drug classes. While drugs such as ketamine and antipsychotics were not commonly detected in injured patients from previous studies, others such as antidepressants are relatively prevalent 2,22 . Meanwhile, other limitations may have resulted in the overestimation of AOD detections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, urine drug screens were limited to six drug classes. While drugs such as ketamine and antipsychotics were not commonly detected in injured patients from previous studies, others such as antidepressants are relatively prevalent 2,22 . Meanwhile, other limitations may have resulted in the overestimation of AOD detections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…While drugs such as ketamine and antipsychotics were not commonly detected in injured patients from previous studies, others such as antidepressants are relatively prevalent. 2 , 22 Meanwhile, other limitations may have resulted in the overestimation of AOD detections. For example, half of the current sample was missing urine drug screen data and it is possible that AOD testing was more likely to be completed for patients who were clinically intoxicated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%