2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0212-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of recurrent oncogenic fusion in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal carcinoma with hypermethylated MLH1 and wild-type BRAF and KRAS

Abstract: Oncogenic fusions are rare in colorectal carcinomas, but may be important for prognosis and therapy. An effective strategy for screening targetable oncogenic fusions in colorectal carcinomas is needed. Here, we investigate molecular genetic alterations in colorectal carcinomas based on their DNA mismatch repair status, and to effectively screen for targetable oncogenic fusions in colorectal carcinomas. In this retrospective study, the initial cohort included 125 consecutive mismatch repair-deficient and 238 ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of MLH1 promoter methylation in this cohort after BRAF mutation detection significantly decreased the number of patients requiring genetic analysis by 23.8% more than BRAF mutation testing alone in the MLH1‐loss group (Supporting Information Fig. S4), which was consistent with previous work demonstrating that 40% of MLH1 ‐methylated CRCs had BRAF V600E mutations . To date, widely accepted international standards for LS screening recommend no further genetic testing upon detection of MLH1 promoter methylation .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of MLH1 promoter methylation in this cohort after BRAF mutation detection significantly decreased the number of patients requiring genetic analysis by 23.8% more than BRAF mutation testing alone in the MLH1‐loss group (Supporting Information Fig. S4), which was consistent with previous work demonstrating that 40% of MLH1 ‐methylated CRCs had BRAF V600E mutations . To date, widely accepted international standards for LS screening recommend no further genetic testing upon detection of MLH1 promoter methylation .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…S4), which was consistent with previous work demonstrating that 40% of MLH1-methylated CRCs had BRAF V600E mutations. 26 To date, widely accepted international standards for LS screening recommend no further genetic testing upon detection of MLH1 promoter methylation. 13,27 However, it is noteworthy that three of 82 (3.7%) cases of CRC with somatic MLH1 promoter methylation were diagnosed as LS with a germline MLH1 mutation in our study, a result in line with previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further interrogate the genomic context in which TRK fusions arise, the TMB of TRK fusionpositive and negative cases were compared. The acquisition of kinase fusions including TRK has been previously associated with the presence of MSI in colorectal cancers 27,28 . Indeed, of cases where MSI testing was available, 86% (6/7) of TRK fusion-positive colorectal cancers were microsatellite high (MSI-H).…”
Section: Subsequent Analysis Of Intrachromosomal Ntrk1 Fusionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…MSI-L phenotypes also occurred in higher percentage in stage I and II cancers in Table 3. In addition, germline sequencing was conducted on nine cases who were confirmed as Lynch syndrome positive [16]. All Lynch syndrome cases exhibited MMR protein expression loss by IHC and MSI-H by ProDx® MSI test.…”
Section: Msi Analysis In Colorectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%