2009
DOI: 10.3906/sag-0709-32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of SEN virus genotype-D and genotype-H among haemodialysed patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding is more consistent with that reported by Karimi-Rastehkenari and Bouzari (2010) confirms the higher frequency of the virus in healthy individuals in Guilan Province in Iran compared to other countries. Also Hosseini and Bouzari (2016) refers to that the SEN V in healthy individual was more frequent 90% than in HBV 66%, and HCV 46% positive individuals,The frequency of genotype SENV-H in healthy individuals was higher than SENV-D, and our result are in agreement with many studies over world (Serin et al, 2005, Serin et al, 2006 finding in Turkey, Kao et al, (2002) in Taiwan reported SENV-H to be more prevalent than SENV-D (Tezcan et al, 2009) but not consistent with that data reported by Mohamed et al, (2011) in Egypt about the predominant of SENV-D genotype in all SENV positives of control group, and from Japan, which detected SENV-D in 77% and SENV-H in 15% of the participants (Kobayashi et al, 2003). Because of the lack of studies on the prevalence of the SENV infection and genotyping in Iraq and the limited submission sequences of this virus on the National Center of biotechnology Information (NCBI), the comparison with standard isolates is represented a challe-nge to us (Abbasi et al, 2016) found that 24% of tested blood donors in Ahvaz City were positive for both SENV-D and SENV-H. (Yoshida et al, 2002) in their study on Japanese patients and (Kao et al, 2002) in Taiwan concluded that there was no significant differences with SEN V infection in patients with liver disease than in patients without liver disease, liver function, age, gender, amount of alcohol intake, and history of blood transfusion between SEN-V-positive and SEN-V-negative, so in many investigation of disease associations with SENV infection should not be limited to hepatitisinfection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our finding is more consistent with that reported by Karimi-Rastehkenari and Bouzari (2010) confirms the higher frequency of the virus in healthy individuals in Guilan Province in Iran compared to other countries. Also Hosseini and Bouzari (2016) refers to that the SEN V in healthy individual was more frequent 90% than in HBV 66%, and HCV 46% positive individuals,The frequency of genotype SENV-H in healthy individuals was higher than SENV-D, and our result are in agreement with many studies over world (Serin et al, 2005, Serin et al, 2006 finding in Turkey, Kao et al, (2002) in Taiwan reported SENV-H to be more prevalent than SENV-D (Tezcan et al, 2009) but not consistent with that data reported by Mohamed et al, (2011) in Egypt about the predominant of SENV-D genotype in all SENV positives of control group, and from Japan, which detected SENV-D in 77% and SENV-H in 15% of the participants (Kobayashi et al, 2003). Because of the lack of studies on the prevalence of the SENV infection and genotyping in Iraq and the limited submission sequences of this virus on the National Center of biotechnology Information (NCBI), the comparison with standard isolates is represented a challe-nge to us (Abbasi et al, 2016) found that 24% of tested blood donors in Ahvaz City were positive for both SENV-D and SENV-H. (Yoshida et al, 2002) in their study on Japanese patients and (Kao et al, 2002) in Taiwan concluded that there was no significant differences with SEN V infection in patients with liver disease than in patients without liver disease, liver function, age, gender, amount of alcohol intake, and history of blood transfusion between SEN-V-positive and SEN-V-negative, so in many investigation of disease associations with SENV infection should not be limited to hepatitisinfection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%