2011
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.05211-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli as Detected by Enzyme-Linked Immunoassays and Real-Time PCR during the Summer Months in Northern Alberta, Canada

Abstract: Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) in northern Alberta was detected using two enzyme immunoassays and an in-house real-time PCR. Of 2,328 stool samples, 8 were positive for O157:H7 STEC and 13 were positive for non-O157 STEC. No significant gender (P ‫؍‬ 0.17) or age (P ‫؍‬ 0.81) differences between groups were seen. Most positive diarrheal stool samples were nonbloody.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar analytical sensitivity of 10 6 CFU/ml for Premier EHEC was previously reported by Willford et al in a study that evaluated three commercially available EIA kits for the detection of STEC (28). The difference of 4 log 10 units between the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) and EIA is also concordant with results obtained previously by Chui et al (29). However, in the latter study, the performance of the EIA in detecting Shiga toxin in stool samples was similar to that of PCR: it missed only 2 of the 21 positive specimens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar analytical sensitivity of 10 6 CFU/ml for Premier EHEC was previously reported by Willford et al in a study that evaluated three commercially available EIA kits for the detection of STEC (28). The difference of 4 log 10 units between the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) and EIA is also concordant with results obtained previously by Chui et al (29). However, in the latter study, the performance of the EIA in detecting Shiga toxin in stool samples was similar to that of PCR: it missed only 2 of the 21 positive specimens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In our study, 16 STEC strains were isolated from 8 patients. The difficulty in recovering STEC strains was previously reported by different authors (27,29,36). This may be explained by the freeze-and-thaw effect killing or inhibiting the growth of pathogens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Another reason for the low prevalence of VTEC may be the difficulty of recovering these isolates, which has already been reported by several authors (Chui et al, 2010(Chui et al, , 2011Pulz et al, 2003). Another hypothesis is a low pathogen's inoculum size, hindering the growth on an agar plate (Vallières et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An alternative approach was used for estimating VTEC non-O157 cases, which is not routinely identified and reported in Canada. For VTEC non-O157 cases, a ratio (1 VTEC O157:1·6 VTEC non-O157, based on literature [43]), relative to the estimate of VTEC O157 cases was used [28,30]. The methods for estimating the number of domestically acquired foodborne hospitalizations and deaths are described in detail elsewhere [30].…”
Section: Estimating Total Illnesses Hospitalizations and Deathsmentioning
confidence: 99%