1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)48939-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Six Sexually Transmitted Disease Agents Among Pregnant Inner-City Adolescents and Pregnancy Outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In that study, the incidence of this complication at term was 27.5% in women with T. vaginalis infection versus 12.8% in those without (P Ͻ 0.03) (75). In another study of pregnant adolescents, T. vaginalis was independently associated with prematurity and low birth weight (36). VOL.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In that study, the incidence of this complication at term was 27.5% in women with T. vaginalis infection versus 12.8% in those without (P Ͻ 0.03) (75). In another study of pregnant adolescents, T. vaginalis was independently associated with prematurity and low birth weight (36). VOL.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Much higher incidence (37%, 25.8%) was reported in a study group, which comprised of high-risk population. 13,15 Low incidence (13.2%) reported by Grossman 16 from a high risk population of pregnant women is reported to be due to the increased transportation time (4 days) that was taken before the samples were processed and this had led to a loss of infectious particles/antigens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new membrane flow OSOM assay from Genzyme is thought to have excellent sensitivity and specificity, with limited skill required to process and interpret the test, but the test is available for use only on female specimens and may be cost-prohibitive (11). In spite of this, levels of infection have typically been high, with reported overall prevalences ranging from 3% to 58% and an unweighted average across studies of 19.6% (4,6,7,10,15,18,20,24,33,37,60,62,64,69,70,77,90,92,95,99,108). Table 1 lists published reports on the occurrence of T. vaginalis infection among women conducted among U.S. populations from 1964 through 2007.…”
Section: Data On the Prevalence Of T Vaginalis Among Us Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%