1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92698-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Six Sexually Transmitted Disease Agents Among Pregnant Inner-City Adolescents and Pregnancy Outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
59
1
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
59
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other investigators have reported a narrower range between 18% and 38% [9][10][11][12]. However, in all studies, Candida colonization rates appear to be significantly higher in gravid women.…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Vaginal Candida Infection In Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Other investigators have reported a narrower range between 18% and 38% [9][10][11][12]. However, in all studies, Candida colonization rates appear to be significantly higher in gravid women.…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Vaginal Candida Infection In Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Several studies of pregnant women have shown that up to 37% carry C. trachomatis in the endocervix, mostly without showing any symptoms [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Moreover, some studies have indicated that some adverse obstetric outcomes, such as preterm labour, preterm rupture of membranes (PROM), spontaneous abortion, foetal death, delayed postpartum endometritis, salpingitis, and risks to the neonate such as low birthweight infants, pneumonia, otitis media, conjunctivitis and/or gastroenteritis, may be related to genital C. trachomatis infection [5,[11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Studies conducted in a number of high and low sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevalence settings have documented high rates of coinfection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) (range, 9 -67%) 17-21 and with Trichomonas vaginalis (TV). [22][23][24] Alternatively, diagnostic testing can be used with subsequent treatment of any additional infections. Epidemiologic partner treatment is generally safe and cost-effective because sexual partners have a high likelihood of infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%