“…According to Shubhabrate et al, (Pal et al, 2019) 68% of the patients had conical shape mesiodens out of which 68% of the population is male. According to (Sejdini and Çerkezi, 2018) there was significant cases of mesiodens in children age group of 7-14 years and most of the mesiodens are conical and shape and the most affected populations are males .According to Devi gopakumar et al, (Nair et al, 2014) sex distribution of M:F equal 2:1 which proves that makes have significant prevalence for mesiodens.According to Poornima P et al, (Poornima, Roopa and Shah, 2014;Gifrina Jayaraj, Sherlin, et al, 2015) sex distribution of M:F equal 1:1, in which 61% of the mesiodens are conical in shape.Moreover, to conclude most of the studies compared go to which there is a prevalence of mesiodens in male population significantly higher than the female population and conical shape mesiodens are more prevalent of all other shapes. But still in this study, there is no significant p value to prove that male population is more significant which is due to lack of sample size and minimise sampling bias.…”