2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-005-1326-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in a Swedish population

Abstract: Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in a Swedish urban female population. The cross-sectional study design included 8,000 randomly selected female residents in Stockholm, 30-79-year old. A postal questionnaire enquired about symptomatic POP, using a validated set of five questions, and about urinary incontinence and demographic data. Of 5,489 women providing adequate information, 454 (8.3%, 95% confidence interval 7.3-9.1%) were classified as having symptomatic POP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
89
3
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
89
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…When the present study was initiated, there was no validated tool for assessing POP and the related symptoms among Japanese women. The questionnaire was constructed with expert's group works and was modeled on the lot of previously validated questionnaires [18,22,25,27,28] and tools that are used to evaluate outpatients during gynecological visits in Japan. Based on these findings, we developed a nine-question self-reported questionnaire to identify patients with symptomatic POP (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the present study was initiated, there was no validated tool for assessing POP and the related symptoms among Japanese women. The questionnaire was constructed with expert's group works and was modeled on the lot of previously validated questionnaires [18,22,25,27,28] and tools that are used to evaluate outpatients during gynecological visits in Japan. Based on these findings, we developed a nine-question self-reported questionnaire to identify patients with symptomatic POP (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is little epidemiological data regarding POP in Japan, despite it being recognized as a disease can be treated in the outpatient or inpatient settings. Moreover, only a few studies have evaluated the distributions of POP according to racial, geographical, and socioeconomic status in the American [7,10,22], British [17], Italian [23], French [24], Turkish [25], Australian [26], and Swedish populations [27]. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the risk factors and prevalence of symptomatic POP among Japanese women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin for all intrauterine devices is probably the use of oval stones inserted into the uterus in saddle camels to prevent conception during long desert journeys. [5][6][7][8] The use of pessaries is common; more than 85% of gynecologists 9 and nearly 98% of urogynecologists prescribe them. 10 They provide anatomic support and can be used as a treatment of choice or in those who decline surgery (e.g., women who plan future childbearing, require temporary relief of prolapse while waiting for surgery or during pregnancy, or do not want surgical repair 11,12 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community- and hospital-based studies indicated that OAB symptoms were more prevalent in patients with POP than in those without [7,8,9,10,15,16]. Although few studies have correlated urgency and DO with POP, they have seldom or never specified whether prolapse was anterior or posterior or provided detailed information on clinical presentations, prevalence symptoms, choice of surgery and outcomes after surgical repair [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%