2005
DOI: 10.17221/5611-vetmed
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in slaughtered pigs in the Czech Republic, 2001-2003

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no such earlier data concerning pig and cattle samples, thus, it is not possible to compare the present results. However, the studies performed in other countries showed that such food producing animals at the slaughterhouse level were also often positive for Campylobacter, although the percentage of such samples was lower than identified during the present survey, and 81 (26.0%) samples out of 311 tested were positive (2,8,19). Biasi et al (2) demonstrated that 18.9% of pig carcasses were Campylobacter-positive (37 samples tested), whereas in Belgium 17% of 383 similar samples were contaminated (8).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There is no such earlier data concerning pig and cattle samples, thus, it is not possible to compare the present results. However, the studies performed in other countries showed that such food producing animals at the slaughterhouse level were also often positive for Campylobacter, although the percentage of such samples was lower than identified during the present survey, and 81 (26.0%) samples out of 311 tested were positive (2,8,19). Biasi et al (2) demonstrated that 18.9% of pig carcasses were Campylobacter-positive (37 samples tested), whereas in Belgium 17% of 383 similar samples were contaminated (8).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…It is not a surprise in the case of broilers, since this kind of meat has been found to be Campylobacter-positive in many countries (4,6,8,11,12,14,19). However, in the present investigation pig and cattle carcasses were also highly contaminated with these bacteria, although a low number of samples tested might have an influence on the obtained results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 42%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Poor slaughter methods and unhygienic meat handling may constitute a potential risk of infections to humans [93]. As Campylobacter are among organisms with enteric predilection and stay in the intestinal contents, cross-contamination of meat can originate from the faeces of the same animal or different animals through the slaughterhouse environment or equipment especially during flaying, evisceration or from cross contamination from hide to carcass [94,95].…”
Section: Contamination Of Meat Products With Campylobactermentioning
confidence: 99%