2016
DOI: 10.1089/aid.2015.0026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Transmitted Drug Resistance Mutations in HIV-1-Infected Drug-Naive Patients from Urban and Suburban Regions of Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After a median duration of 6.5 years on ART, the rate of viral suppression among adolescents in this study was 80%, which was higher than the national prevalence of 63% reported in 2016. 6 This rate is comparable with studies in Eswatini and South Africa, at 84% and 85%, respectively. 19 , 24 However, this observed level of viral suppression falls short of the UNAIDS’ 90-90-90 target.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After a median duration of 6.5 years on ART, the rate of viral suppression among adolescents in this study was 80%, which was higher than the national prevalence of 63% reported in 2016. 6 This rate is comparable with studies in Eswatini and South Africa, at 84% and 85%, respectively. 19 , 24 However, this observed level of viral suppression falls short of the UNAIDS’ 90-90-90 target.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…3 The improved viral suppression may be related to the launch of the “test and treat” guidelines in 2016 in Kenya, which placed emphasis on enhanced adherence counseling (EAC) and support for patients with high viral loads. 6 Patients with high viral loads receive three sessions of EAC after which a repeat viral load test was performed. Our findings suggest that the WHO target of 90% viral suppression is possible for adolescents in Kenya.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found a similar PDR prevalence (9%-13%) across urban and rural sites, which was contrary to our expectation that PDR 1) 20 (0) 14 (118-24 39 7) 32 (7) 7 (025 -35 247 (30) 169 (24) 78 635-50 386 (27) 218 (18) 168 950+ 143 (13) 80 6 prevalence would be lower at the rural than the urban clinics. Whereas some previous studies have generally found lower PDR in rural settings [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49], our more recent results may reflect improved access to ART in the rural regions. Our observed 12% PDR prevalence among 212 adult participants (11% among ARV-naive) at the rural Maseno clinic was slightly higher than the 9% TDR prevalence observed in another recently published study of 87 ARV-naive participants conducted in 2012, also based in Western Kenya [50], providing further evidence of PDR in this rural setting.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…At least two of these studies [17,20] tested many subtype samples collected from around the world including Africa. These studies include the predominant HIV subtypes seen in Kenya such as subtype A, D, C, G and recombinants [21,22,36,37]. The good agreement seen between Aptima VL results and Abbott RT seen in this study also suggest that subtype quantification of Aptima is equivalent to that of Abbott RT for the HIV subtypes prevalent in Kenya.…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 70%