“…The 27 studies included in this meta-analysis adopted various study designs. The majority were prospective cohort (n = 12; 44%) [161,170,174,220,222,227,229,[231][232][233]235,236] followed by cross- sectional studies (n = 11; 41%) [214][215][216][217][218][219]221,223,226,228,230] and retrospective cohort (n = 4; 14%) [171,224,225,234]. The greater majority (n = 22; 77%) investigated Chagasic CM due to T. cruzi infection and the remaining 23% investigated malaria CM due to Plasmodium infection [161,170,171,174,236].…”