A previously published study investigating 3 months of home-based resistance exercise showed improved strength and performance of activities of daily living (ADLs) in 20 Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) patients. 1 We attempted to follow up these patients 20-34 months after completion of the intervention to see if the improvement was sustained. Only 9 (6 women, 3 men; mean age 48.2 6 7.8 years) of the original 20 patients (<50%) agreed to undergo follow-up assessment. Of these 9, only 3 (33%; 2 women, 1 man) reported continuing regular exercise. Subjects who continued strength training utilized the resistance exercise program described in the study by Chetlin and co-workers, 1 including elbow and knee flexion and extension movements performed three times per week with wrist and ankle weights. Hand-grip exercises were also performed. Of the 11 subjects who did not participate in the follow-up study, 8 could not be contacted and 3 declined participation, without specifying a reason. Isometric muscle force and timed ADLs were measured. Independent t-tests determined demographic differences between continued trainers (CTs) and discontinued trainers (DTs). Dependent t-tests compared follow-up to original data. Pearson's product correlations determined relationships between strength, ADLs, and demographics. CTs produced less force versus original posttest measures in right elbow extension (7.9 6 3.1 kg vs. 9.2 6 2.6 kg, P < 0.05) and left elbow flexion (10.8 6 3.5 kg vs. 15.3 6 4.0 kg, P < 0.05), whereas DTs produced less force in right elbow extension only (8.9 6 1.7 kg vs. 10.1 6 2.0 kg, P < 0.05). DTs were slower in lift and reach (19.6 6 3.5 s vs. 17.3 6 1.9 s, P < 0.05), supine rise (1.6 6 0.3 s vs. 1.3 6 0.3 s, P < 0.01), and stair climb (11.0 6 8.1 s vs. 9.4 6 7.6 s, P < 0.01), whereas CTs were not different versus original posttest ADL performance.Our findings show that both those who continued training and those who discontinued training lost strength versus the original study posttest measures, but functional ability was lost only in those who discontinued training. We conclude that patients with CMT benefited from a supervised exercise program and had improved strength and functional abilities, but, despite some loss in strength, functional gains may be maintained by continued unsupervised exercise. Although the number of patients retested is small, these results, in conjunction with our previous study, are encouraging in showing that CMT patients can achieve sustained improvement in function with exercise education and supervision if regular exercise is continued. This adds to the pool of information that helps dispel concerns that exercise is harmful to patients with CMT. The recent work by Burns and colleagues appears to support our contention that an appropriate resistance exercise prescription for CMT patients is not harmful and may provide additional benefit if such training is continued long term.2 The moderate-intensity strength training program that our CMT patients continued included those exercise varia...