Peer reviewed article he extent to which the use of catheter care bundles and other interventions has led to a reduction in urinary catheterisation rates is unknown. We aimed to determine current urinary catheterisation rates in care homes with residents over 65 years old, and determine the extent to which residents are discharged from the hospital setting with urinary catheters. A point prevalence questionnaire survey was used in care homes that looked after residents over 65 years in six UK health boards or primary care trusts, to determine urinary catheterisation rates, and where these catheters were inserted. Questionnaires for 445 of 461 care homes (96.5%) were completed, 425 of 445 care homes cared for residents over 65 years; 888 (6.9%) of 12,827 residents had a urethral (82.5%) or supra-pubic (17.5%) urinary catheter. Over half of all catheters (both urethral and suprapubic, 57.4%, 509 of 888 catheters), and 3.1% of all residents had a catheter inserted while the residents were hospital inpatients, and then discharged back to the care home still catheterised. There was a significant variation in urinary catheterisation rates in the care homes surveyed, and rates remain similar to previous English surveys in 2003 and 2009. More still needs to be done to understand the variation in urinary catheterisation rates in care homes and reduce these rates, including the numbers of residents that are discharged from hospital with a urinary catheter.
IntroductionRecent surveys in UK care homes found that about 8% of residents in registered homes had long-term urinary catheters (McNulty et al, 2006;Lomas et al, 2009). This mean UK figure conceals a wide range of prevalence of urinary catheterisation from zero to almost 50% (Lomas et al, 2009), indicating that there is an opportunity to reduce catheterisation rates. Urinary catheterisation is associated with significant morbidity; residents with urinary catheters in care homes have up to an eightfold greater risk of harbouring resistant bacteria such as extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria (Tinelli et al, 2012) and these patients are significantly more likely to be taking antimicrobials (Cotter et al, 2012), develop healthcare associated infections (Eriksen et al, 2007) and bacteraemia (Chazan et al, 2009).Care home staff have indicated that many of their residents are discharged from hospital after an inpatient stay with a catheter (McNulty et al, 2008) and indeed our 2008 survey confirmed that 57% of urinary catheters in Gloucestershire care homes were inserted in hospitals (Lomas et al, 2009). Over the last five years there have been a series of care bundles introduced for community and hospital care (Wilson, 2011, pp. 16-25), with the aim of reducing urinary catheterisation rates and catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI).
Study aims