2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11657-020-0695-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and its predictors in the Portuguese population: a nationwide population-based study

Abstract: Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent worldwide, but its prevalence is unknown in adult Portuguese population. In Portugal, 66% of adults present Vitamin D insufficiency/deficiency. Winter, living in Azores, older age, and obesity were the most important risk factors. It highlights the need of strategies to prevent vitamin D deficiency in Portugal. Objective To estimate the prevalence and risk factors of vitamin D deficiency in the adult Portuguese population. Methods Adults (≥ 18 years old) from the EpiReumaPt St… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In adults (but not in the elderly), we observed significant differences in the mean vitamin D values between sexes, with males having higher mean values than females at 55.3 (95% CI: 46.4, 64.1) and 46.2 (95%CI: 40.4, 51.9) nmol/L, respectively. These findings are consistent with those of some other studies [34,44,47,49,59], but there are also studies with opposite observations (India, Saudi Arabia) [60,61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In adults (but not in the elderly), we observed significant differences in the mean vitamin D values between sexes, with males having higher mean values than females at 55.3 (95% CI: 46.4, 64.1) and 46.2 (95%CI: 40.4, 51.9) nmol/L, respectively. These findings are consistent with those of some other studies [34,44,47,49,59], but there are also studies with opposite observations (India, Saudi Arabia) [60,61].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Considering our inability to observe this trend in the adult population, we should note that the sample of elderly participants (65-74 years) was much more homogenous in their age interval than the adult subjects, whose age interval was much higher (18-65 years). On the other hand, smoking was identified as a significant predictor of mean serum 25(OH)D levels, with current smokers having a lower means compared to non-or ex-smokers, which is in agreement with other studies [44,47]. Interestingly, in our study, the use of vitamin D supplements was not identified as a significant predictor of vitamin D status.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…<20 ng/ml or <50 nmol/l). 25,27,31,34,[39][40][41]43,[45][46][47] The size of study population which was used to retrieve data for the prevalence of Vit D deficiency varied from 280 (Slovenia) 43 to 74.235 subjects (Italy). 37 As of February, 4 th We also examined the relationships between COVID-19 infections, recoveries and deaths with the mean vitamin D concentration of each country, as can been seen in the Supplementary Material, but again no significant correlation was found.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%