2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of Voice Problems, Self-Reported Vocal Symptoms and Associated Risk Factors in Call Center Operators (CCOs): A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings in our study are parallel to the systematic review by Nair et al ., which reported a prevalence of between 33 and 68 per cent of voice disorders among call centre operators. 2 Similarly, a high prevalence rate of approximately 70 per cent was reported among telemarketers by several other studies. 7,8 The work burden of teleoperators working in a hospital may be reckoned to be lower compared with telemarketers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings in our study are parallel to the systematic review by Nair et al ., which reported a prevalence of between 33 and 68 per cent of voice disorders among call centre operators. 2 Similarly, a high prevalence rate of approximately 70 per cent was reported among telemarketers by several other studies. 7,8 The work burden of teleoperators working in a hospital may be reckoned to be lower compared with telemarketers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The career prevalence of voice problems in call centre operators varies between 33 and 68 per cent. 2 Yet there is an urgent need for research to support occupational voice health and safety risk measurement, prevention and intervention. A meta-analysis published by Cutiva et al found a total of 18 cross-sectional studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outside of the bone conduction studies, AAF research related to voice production has primarily been examined in daily life using self-reported symptoms as proxies for impaired voice production, especially in occupational voice users (Cutiva et al, 2013;Martins et al, 2014;Nair et al, 2021). However, alterations in voice production secondary to AAF can be more objectively quantified in laboratory settings through vocal loading tasks (VLTs), which aid in understanding how speakers without voice disorders respond vocally to challenging scenarios (Kelchner et al, 2006;Solomon & DiMattia, 2000;Stemple et al, 1995).…”
Section: [Insert Figure 1 About Here]mentioning
confidence: 99%