2022
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2136400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence, risk factors and adverse perinatal outcomes for Chinese women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a large cross-sectional retrospective study

Abstract: Background Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is the most common pregnancy-related liver disorder and may cause adverse perinatal outcomes. This large cross-sectional retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and related risk factors of ICP and determine the adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods This large cohort study from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019, included 39,742 eligible pregnant women. Data were extracted from the institutional electronic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High-risk factors for ICP revealed in published clinical studies are not entirely consistent. A cohort study of 39,742 pregnant women showed that maternal age younger than 25 years or older than 35 years, low or high prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), being positive for hepatitis B surface antigen, multiple pregnancies, low maternal education level, insufficient pregnancy weight gain, in vitro fertilization, history of cesarean delivery, or history of two or more miscarriages were all associated with an increased risk of ICP 7 . In addition to these factors, a retrospective study of 39,244 pregnant women found that those with gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, thrombocytopenia, hyperlipidemia, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) had a higher risk of ICP than others 8 .…”
Section: Clinical Question 1: What Are the High-risk Factors Associat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-risk factors for ICP revealed in published clinical studies are not entirely consistent. A cohort study of 39,742 pregnant women showed that maternal age younger than 25 years or older than 35 years, low or high prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), being positive for hepatitis B surface antigen, multiple pregnancies, low maternal education level, insufficient pregnancy weight gain, in vitro fertilization, history of cesarean delivery, or history of two or more miscarriages were all associated with an increased risk of ICP 7 . In addition to these factors, a retrospective study of 39,244 pregnant women found that those with gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, thrombocytopenia, hyperlipidemia, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) had a higher risk of ICP than others 8 .…”
Section: Clinical Question 1: What Are the High-risk Factors Associat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several noteworthy clinical observations regarding liver disease with hypercholanemia warrant emphasis. Researchers have already looked at studies with hepatitis patients and found that HBsAg-positive ICP patients had much higher levels of serum TBA and a higher risk of bad outcomes during pregnancy [ 9 ]. However, these studies did not compare the risk of poor pregnancy outcomes at the same TBA levels between ICP and other hypercholanemias in pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of risk factors or co-morbidities can increase the risk of stillbirth in women with ICP, according to the ICP clinical guideline published in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (BJOG) in 2022 [ 18 ]. There is a lot of evidence that hepatitis increases oxidative stress during the development of hypercholanemia [ 33–35 ], which leads to higher levels of total TBA in the peripheral blood compared to ICP [ 9 , 30 , 36 ]. Therefore, in patients who have TBA ≥100µmol/L and also have liver disease, excessive TBA concentrations and liver disease could work together to cause oxidative stress, which raises the risk of perinatal death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every study included in this systematic review scored greater than 50% on the quality checklist. Seven of the studies synthesized in this systematic review and meta-analysis were of moderate quality, 22,24,29,33,32,34,37 and three were of good quality 30,35,36 (Table 1).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Methodological Quality Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%