2017
DOI: 10.4149/bll_2017_123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalent placement error of deep brain stimulation electrode in movement disorders (technical considerations)

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation is an effective and safe technique. Displacement of the electrode relative to the optimal stimulation site can lead to insuffi cient effect and sometimes to the need of operative electrode re-position. OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to analyse targeting accuracy of deep brain stimulation electrode implantation to subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (Gpi). It detected possible causes of inaccuracy and prevalent shift to certain direction. METHODS: Targeting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional DBS electrodes present several drawbacks such as the rigidity of the materials employed for fabrication as well as a high size which exacerbate the neuroinflammatory response and tissue damage. Although they have a higher activation radius compared to microelectrodes, macroelectrode implantation is often associated to a wrong positioning in the interested area causing a decrease in therapeutic efficacy of DBS (Kloc et al, 2017; Morishita et al, 2017). In the case of small target areas, the reduced dimensions of microelectrodes can provide a better targeting accuracy ensuring an increased therapeutic efficacy of DBS and tissue integration for chronic applications (Desai et al, 2012; Du et al, 2017; Ganji et al, 2017).…”
Section: Implantable Electrodes In Neurological and Neuropsychiatric mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional DBS electrodes present several drawbacks such as the rigidity of the materials employed for fabrication as well as a high size which exacerbate the neuroinflammatory response and tissue damage. Although they have a higher activation radius compared to microelectrodes, macroelectrode implantation is often associated to a wrong positioning in the interested area causing a decrease in therapeutic efficacy of DBS (Kloc et al, 2017; Morishita et al, 2017). In the case of small target areas, the reduced dimensions of microelectrodes can provide a better targeting accuracy ensuring an increased therapeutic efficacy of DBS and tissue integration for chronic applications (Desai et al, 2012; Du et al, 2017; Ganji et al, 2017).…”
Section: Implantable Electrodes In Neurological and Neuropsychiatric mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of those 711 surgeries, 169 patients required the DBS system to be either replaced or removed entirely [ 29 ]. These side effects and adverse outcomes can partially be attributed to suboptimal placement of the DBS lead, which is dependent on the accuracy of the preoperative planning procedures [ 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a contemporary DBS workflow, at least the following contributing factors must be taken into account: the platform used for placement (stereotactic frame), stereotactic imaging, co-registration, and intraoperative imaging. 5 Due to imaging advancements, DBS teams have the possibility to adapt these factors. Although improvement of surgical workflow and patient comfort is pursued by these…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%