Abstract
Background: In sub-Saharan Africa, the material and human capacity to diagnose patients reporting with fever to healthcare providers is largely insufficient. Febrile patients are typically treated presumptively with antimalarials and/or antibiotics. Such over-prescription can lead to drug resistance and involves unnecessary costs to the health system. International funding for malaria is decreasing and transition to domestic funding is challenged by UHC efforts and recent COVID-19 outbreak. Herewith we present a digital approach to markedly improve efficiencies in diagnosis and treatment of malaria in endemic Kisumu, Kenya. The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility, user experience, clinical performance and of Connected Diagnostics in Kisumu and to assess over-prescription of antimalarials. Methods: Our intervention was performed Oct 2017 – Dec 2018 across seven providers in Kisumu. Patients were enrolled on M-TIBA platform, diagnostic test results digitized, and only positive patients were digitally entitled for malaria treatment. Data on socio-demographics, healthcare transactions and medical outcomes were analysed using standard descriptive quantitative statistics. Provider perspectives were gathered by 19 semi-structured interviews. Results: In total 11,689 febrile patients were tested. Malaria positivity rates ranged from 7.4% to 30.2% between providers, with significantly more positive cases amongst the poor (p< 0.05). Over-prescription of antimalarials was 28%, fluctuating between 4.6% to 63.3% per provider. Prescription of branded versus generic antimalarials was dichotomous. Challenges were encountered transitioning from microscopy to RDT. Conclusion: We provide full proof-of-concept of innovative Connected Diagnostics to use digitized malaria diagnostics to earmark digital entitlements for correct malaria treatment of patients. This approach has large cost-saving and quality improving potential.