2022 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/bibm55620.2022.9995121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevent Over-fitting and Redundancy in Physiological Signal Analyses for Stress Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, LASSO is effective in excluding insignificant variables by selecting an optimal subset of predictors [191] , [192] . For ROC curves, regularisation can be used to prevent the model from over-fitting the training data, ensuring that the performance, as measured by the area under the curve (AUC), is realistic and reproducible on new datasets [194] . This can be achieved by implementing cross-validation techniques during the training process to evaluate the effectiveness of the model on different subsets of the dataset, ensuring that the model is well-trained and generalizable [195] , [196] .…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, LASSO is effective in excluding insignificant variables by selecting an optimal subset of predictors [191] , [192] . For ROC curves, regularisation can be used to prevent the model from over-fitting the training data, ensuring that the performance, as measured by the area under the curve (AUC), is realistic and reproducible on new datasets [194] . This can be achieved by implementing cross-validation techniques during the training process to evaluate the effectiveness of the model on different subsets of the dataset, ensuring that the model is well-trained and generalizable [195] , [196] .…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They achieved an accuracy of 96.6% when dealing only with two classes (stress-no stress). The same dataset has been extensively used, in combination with machine learning 13,14 or deep learning 15,16 algorithms in the context of the stress detection problem.…”
Section: Physiological Signals-based Stress Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They achieved an accuracy of 96.6% when dealing only with two classes (stress-no stress). The same dataset has been extensively used in combination with machine learning [14,15] or deep learning [16,17] algorithms in the context of the stress detection problem.…”
Section: Physiological Signal-based Stress Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%