2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12939-017-0688-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventative health, diversity, and inclusion: a qualitative study of client experience aboard a mobile health clinic in Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract: BackgroundThere are approximately 2000 mobile health clinics operating in the United States. While researchers have established that mobile health clinics can be cost effective and improve outcomes, there is scant research examining the healthcare experience on a mobile health clinic from patients’ perspectives.MethodsData were gathered from interviews with 25 clients receiving care on a Boston-based mobile health clinic and analyzed using grounded theory methodology.ResultsEmerging patterns in the data reveal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They frame patient experiences as welcoming vs unwelcoming, noting that the latter’s stigmatising ethic, like in our findings of patient experiences in the mainstream health system, leads to system aversion. Our findings also parallel those of Bouchelle et al ’s20 exploration of the experiences of medically vulnerable people accessing a mobile health van in Boston. Bouchelle et al found that in addition to accessible communication styles, a diverse and knowledgeable workforce, and conveniently located services, a culture of respect and dignity aboard the outreach clinic was central in facilitating access to service.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They frame patient experiences as welcoming vs unwelcoming, noting that the latter’s stigmatising ethic, like in our findings of patient experiences in the mainstream health system, leads to system aversion. Our findings also parallel those of Bouchelle et al ’s20 exploration of the experiences of medically vulnerable people accessing a mobile health van in Boston. Bouchelle et al found that in addition to accessible communication styles, a diverse and knowledgeable workforce, and conveniently located services, a culture of respect and dignity aboard the outreach clinic was central in facilitating access to service.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…They further contribute to the small body of qualitative evidence for the effectiveness of mobile health clinics that serve people who are deprived of housing 3. While recent qualitative work1 19 20 explored why people use a mobile health clinic (accessing basic necessities, convenience, friendly atmosphere), our findings probe what it is about the model that works. Our findings describe the nuances of quality care and help to elucidate the what and the how behind the quantitative evidence of the effectiveness of mobile health clinics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The people and organizations that operate mobile clinics are often motivated by a commitment to underserved communities and use the mobile clinic as a vehicle to deliver care in ways that differ from traditional medical settings. For example, Bouchelle and colleagues reported that The Family Van, a mobile clinic in Boston, creates a culture of respect and inclusivity [16]. In many instances, mobile clinics serve as a bridge between communities and the health care system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of a statewide CDCP grew from conversations with community partners frustrated with the toll of a tainted drug supply. They yielded 3 observations: (1) emerging evidence from Canada suggested that CDCPs might be synergistic with other harm-reduction programming; (2) Massachusetts's state-supported interventions for overdose response included naloxone distribution, 18 postoverdose outreach, 19 and mobile health units, 20 all of which provided opportunities for patient-centered, low-threshold, harm-reduction programming and possible drug checking initiatives; and (3) research led by Dr Green and colleagues 16,21 indicated that technologies are available for CDCPs.…”
Section: Conceptualizing the Programmentioning
confidence: 99%