2005
DOI: 10.1080/02634930500050032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventing conflict by building civil society: post-development theory and a central Asian–uk policy success story

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It 'survived' because simulacra of peacebuilding were retained in the evaluation of these programmes. The argument made here evokes the provocative satire of conflict prevention in Central Asia by Megoran (2005), whilst echoing the argument of Debrix (1999) regarding the simulation or 're-envisioning' of international peacekeeping. It raises the question: if the local community is simulated, what or where is being discursively constructed?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It 'survived' because simulacra of peacebuilding were retained in the evaluation of these programmes. The argument made here evokes the provocative satire of conflict prevention in Central Asia by Megoran (2005), whilst echoing the argument of Debrix (1999) regarding the simulation or 're-envisioning' of international peacekeeping. It raises the question: if the local community is simulated, what or where is being discursively constructed?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Some fifteen years later, there are signs that the grave diggers (if I may interpret them as such) were again too quick in their actions. We find that many academic authors did not share the view that the PD debate is obsolete, but used it as a theoretical foundation or at least a starting point from which to develop their argument in the 2000s (see among others Agostino, ; Brigg, ; Cavalcanti, ; Cox, ; Cupples et al., ; Curry, ; Gephart, ; Gibson‐Graham, ; Gilgenbach and Moser, ; Hacker, , ; Lie, ; Lind, ; Matthews, , ; McGregor, ; McKinnon, ; Megoran, ; Nustad, ; Rapley, ; Saunders, ; Sauviat, ; Sidaway, ; Simon, ; Underhill‐Sem, ; Van Ausdal, ; de Vries, ; Ziai, ; etc.). Ahorro () has termed this the ‘second wave’ of PD.…”
Section: The Premature Burial Of Post‐developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Desde entonces, la literatura general sobre Asia Central ha sido dominada por estudios enfocados al análisis del estado en términos de "transición política" (Rumer 2005), "continuidad" de las élites en el poder y de los gobiernos autoritarios (Dudarev 2001;Gafarly & Rass 2001;Botiakov 2003;Schatz 2002), "democratización" (Kovalskii 2001), "sociedad civil" (Holt 1999;Starr 1999;Freizer 2005;Megoran 2005), y nacionalismo y etnicidad (Atkin 1992;Gross 1992;Roy 2000;Abashin, 2006). La m a y o r í a d e l o s t e m a s e c o n ó m i c o s s e r e f i e r e n a t r a n s f o r m a c i o n e s t a l e s c o m o l a s r e f o r m a s a g r a r i a s ( Z h u k o v 2 0 0 5 ) , p r i v a t i z a c i o n e s , " t r a n s i c i ó n " a l a e c o n o m í a d e mercado (Uyanik & Segni 2001;Volgina, Gafarly & Semenova 2001;Trushin & Trushin 2002;Zhukov 2002), y crisis y ayuda internacional.…”
Section: Revisión De Literatura: Zonas Teóricas Sobre Asia Centralunclassified