2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventing further misuse of the ELISA technique and misinterpretation of serological antibody assay data

Abstract: The indirect ELISA is a widely utilized method to assay serum antibodies. However, a common and critical problem when analyzing serum antibodies is the disregard for the background noise reaction caused by the hydrophobic binding of immunoglobulin components in serum components to plastic. Unfortunately, current blocking agents cannot prevent this background noise reaction. To prevent further misuse of the ELISA technique, it is important to openly discuss the fundamental problems involved in the ELISA system.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, data influenced largely by this BG noise reaction [1] has led to numerous uncertain conclusions and misunderstandings as discussed [2] , [3] , [4] . To prevent further misuse of the ELISA technique and misinterpretation of serological antibody assay data, it is important to reconsider the principle of the immunoassay system and all types of non-specific reactions involved [5] . The following are basic issues that all ELISA users must take into consideration before setting up an ELISA system for assaying antibodies.…”
Section: Description Of Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, data influenced largely by this BG noise reaction [1] has led to numerous uncertain conclusions and misunderstandings as discussed [2] , [3] , [4] . To prevent further misuse of the ELISA technique and misinterpretation of serological antibody assay data, it is important to reconsider the principle of the immunoassay system and all types of non-specific reactions involved [5] . The following are basic issues that all ELISA users must take into consideration before setting up an ELISA system for assaying antibodies.…”
Section: Description Of Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, these studies were conducted using immunoassay systems such as radioimmunoassay (RIA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) without considering the intense background (BG) noise reaction caused by hydrophobic binding of immunoglobulins and immune-complexes in sample specimens to plastic surfaces. Consequently, misinterpretation of serological antibody assay data, which are largely influenced by the strong BG noise reaction and other false positive reactions, has led to uncertain conclusions and misunderstandings as discussed in detail [ 11 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of aquaculture biota could be done in several ways, including isolation of the disease-causing agent and its morphological analysis, antibody detection resulting from infection with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or ELISA techniques, and gene detection of the disease-carrier agent with PCR [96][97][98]. One of the most widely applied and developed techniques today was PCR capable of amplifying DNA fragments in vitro.…”
Section: Dna Marker Methods To Evaluation and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%