2015
DOI: 10.5771/0032-3470-2015-2-159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventing German Bank Failures: Federalism and decisions to save troubled banks

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Whether a bank is viewed by politicians as 'systemically important' varies based on how its failure would affect supporters of the government. How a federation is designed has a strong influence on which banks are given public assistance. Where the top level of government is solely responsible for banks, there will be fewer systemically important institutions and so more banks will be allowed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Incumbent politicians face a dilemma. They may want to assist banks in order to reestablish financial stability and bolster banks that are important for their local economies (see Deo et al 2015 andReinke 2014). They also face opposing pressures in terms of EDP enforcement, more expensive financing, and the possibility of being voted out of office for costly bailouts.…”
Section: Rules and Policy Choices During The Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Incumbent politicians face a dilemma. They may want to assist banks in order to reestablish financial stability and bolster banks that are important for their local economies (see Deo et al 2015 andReinke 2014). They also face opposing pressures in terms of EDP enforcement, more expensive financing, and the possibility of being voted out of office for costly bailouts.…”
Section: Rules and Policy Choices During The Crisismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These do not appear on the government accounts. They may, however, appear as formal government guarantees, or they may not appear at all in any reports, but they exist because one or more financial institution is considered by politicians as "too big to fail" and will receive public money if they get into trouble (see Deo et al, 2015). In principle, M is any possible contingent liability, which would include guarantees to state-owned enterprises, implicit guarantees to public-private partnerships, and future pension obligations (Brooks, 2009).…”
Section: Model: Choosing Transparencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of state-owned Landesbanken (Deo et al 2015), the system has performed well. Sparkassen, cooperatives, and large banks have been vocal political advocates of keeping the system intact, and attacking EDIS as inferior for lack of supervision and commitment to institutional continuity.…”
Section: Germanymentioning
confidence: 99%