2016
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6505a1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
280
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 408 publications
(429 reference statements)
3
280
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Influenza vaccination (1) Changes are related to the low effectiveness of the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) (FluMist, MedImmune) against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in the United States during the 2013-2014 and 2015-2016 influenza seasons and revised recommendations for the use of influenza vaccine among patients with egg allergy. These changes are reflected in the 2017 adult immunization schedule as follows:…”
Section: Changes In the 2017 Adult Immunization Schedulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Influenza vaccination (1) Changes are related to the low effectiveness of the live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) (FluMist, MedImmune) against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in the United States during the 2013-2014 and 2015-2016 influenza seasons and revised recommendations for the use of influenza vaccine among patients with egg allergy. These changes are reflected in the 2017 adult immunization schedule as follows:…”
Section: Changes In the 2017 Adult Immunization Schedulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…RNA structure and polymerase fidelity RNA viruses exhibit high mutation rates due to the high error rates of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Viral replication during the egg adaptation process frequently results in gene mutations, which may alter the antigenic properties of the HA Modified from Grohskopf et al [5] and NA proteins derived from the wild-type viruses. Frequent amino acid substitutions in HA have been reported during the propagation of the viruses in eggs.…”
Section: Vaccine Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, in June 2016, the American Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended that LAIV should not be used during the 2016-2017 influenza season, while the same decision was not accepted by several other health authorities such as Canada, UK, and Finland where LAIV VE was considered adequate [4]. Possible explanations for reduced LAIV VE has been a decreased immune response against A/H1N1pdm09 (thought to be the result of a more highly vaccinated population during seasons 2013-2014 and 2015-2016), antigenically drifted A/H3N2 viruses during the 2014-2015 season, potential interference of viruses included in the LAIV, heat susceptibility, and also methodological issues in studies (biases in the design and statistical limits) [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 As a consequence, the US Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended that LAIV not be used in the US in 2016/17 and that IIV should be utilized instead. 18 In the UK, Canada and Finland, the problem with the pH1N1 component although still evident, was not nearly as drastic, with effectiveness rates of 40-50% reported in 2015/16. [19][20][21] Emphasising the variability in VE results, the US ICICLE study also reported pH1N1 VE of 50%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%