2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage in low-resource settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
106
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
106
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The study limitations include: [1] major obstetric hemorrhage was a rare event in our series; [2] the a priori definition of transfusion of C5 pRBC units was at the discretion of the senior physician and hence some cases may have had major obstetric hemorrhage, but units needed/used were underestimated; [3] relevant risk factors such as body mass index/obesity were not captured for the control group and hence no comparative analyses were possible; [4] major obstetric hemorrhage patients who underwent uterine conservation techniques to control major obstetric hemorrhage are few and thus the discrete implication on outcomes is difficult to assess; and [5] cultural and health insurance homogeneity of the cohorts makes extrapolation to other populations difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study limitations include: [1] major obstetric hemorrhage was a rare event in our series; [2] the a priori definition of transfusion of C5 pRBC units was at the discretion of the senior physician and hence some cases may have had major obstetric hemorrhage, but units needed/used were underestimated; [3] relevant risk factors such as body mass index/obesity were not captured for the control group and hence no comparative analyses were possible; [4] major obstetric hemorrhage patients who underwent uterine conservation techniques to control major obstetric hemorrhage are few and thus the discrete implication on outcomes is difficult to assess; and [5] cultural and health insurance homogeneity of the cohorts makes extrapolation to other populations difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The strengths of our study include: [1] a single facility population with only in-hospital cases; [2] large sample size and case matching within the same in-hospital population; [3] statistical models with high accuracy values; [4] use of the same validated database and blood bank reports, reducing ascertainment bias and misclassifications; [5] inclusion only of cases transfused versus blood bank requests to prepare blood products; [6] criteria of C5 p RBC units reflecting genuine hemodynamic instability; [7] real-time records of delivery data, anesthesia, and neonatal outcome [8]. Overall, the analysis showed a high C statistics value reflective of outstanding discriminatory power of the model for the risk factors identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we did not review PPH guidelines by the World Health Organization 22 and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 23 which are more clinically relevant to providers in low-resource settings. Four authors (R.S., C.F.W., N.A., A.J.B.)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unique guidelines were created for the FRPC. They were based on the recommendations for PPH management issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) [5], the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) [6] and the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) [7]. The guidelines consisted of a theoretical part, algorithms (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%