2017
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention forecast: cloudy with a chance of injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Association between these static postural assessments and associated back pain/injury has not been validated. Based on comparable systematic reviews 1,19,28 and relevant clinical commentary, 11,42 referenced outcome tools were divided into clinical constructs to comprehensively screen for injury risk in elite swimmers. These constructs include: (1) mobility, (2) strength/endurance, (3) static and dynamic postures, and (4) patient report (Figure 2).…”
Section: Spinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Association between these static postural assessments and associated back pain/injury has not been validated. Based on comparable systematic reviews 1,19,28 and relevant clinical commentary, 11,42 referenced outcome tools were divided into clinical constructs to comprehensively screen for injury risk in elite swimmers. These constructs include: (1) mobility, (2) strength/endurance, (3) static and dynamic postures, and (4) patient report (Figure 2).…”
Section: Spinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,14,29 In the context of sport participation and athletic performance, screening has been defined as a strategy used to detect conditions in individuals without signs or symptoms of that condition. 11,42 The goal is to identify risk factors early and enable timely intervention and management to reduce future morbidity, missed practice and competition time, and progression of injury. Other research advocates that risk factors should be identified to better understand why injuries occur and to predict which athletes are at increased risk for injury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et que ce ne sera probablement jamais le cas ! Van Dyk et Clarsen[16] abondent dans ce sens et rappellent que le fait d'associer un facteur de risque avec une blessure ne signifie pas que nous pouvons identifier précisément des athlètes à risque, c'est-à-dire que ce facteur de risque ne pourra pas représenter un élément prédictif suffisamment fiable de lésion ultérieure. Ils exhortent les scientifiques à développer plutôt des stratégies préventives faciles à implémenter sur le terrain, comme par exemple le programme FIFA 11+, et à observer son efficacité parmi différentes populations spécifiques.Bittencourt et al considèrent que le modèle de van Mechelen est surtout un modèle linéaire qui ne peut donc prendre en compte les interactions entre les différents facteurs de risque lésionnels[17].…”
unclassified