2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of abortion in cattle following vaccination against bovine herpesvirus 1: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study, in accordance with those reported previously [22,23], suggested no risk of adverse reactions following the administration of either inactivated gE-deleted marker vaccine. In addition, the outcomes of the present study are in accordance with those of other studies [24], showing that the vaccination of pregnant cattle can prevent IBR-induced abortion. It is currently known [25,26] that other herpesviruses are involved in cattle abortion, but little information is available on the ability of vaccines prepared against BoHV-1 to protect against abortion induced by Bovine gammaherpesvirus 4 (BoHV-4) and Bovine alphaherpesvirus 5 (BoHV-5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results of this study, in accordance with those reported previously [22,23], suggested no risk of adverse reactions following the administration of either inactivated gE-deleted marker vaccine. In addition, the outcomes of the present study are in accordance with those of other studies [24], showing that the vaccination of pregnant cattle can prevent IBR-induced abortion. It is currently known [25,26] that other herpesviruses are involved in cattle abortion, but little information is available on the ability of vaccines prepared against BoHV-1 to protect against abortion induced by Bovine gammaherpesvirus 4 (BoHV-4) and Bovine alphaherpesvirus 5 (BoHV-5).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Researchers have contributed by increasing our understanding of the factors affecting calving and conception rates in beef herds. Among the main causes of reduced reproductive efficiency in beef, we find infectious diseases [ 1 , 2 ], such as bovine viral diarrhea [ 3 , 4 ], infectious bovine rhinotracheitis [ 5 ], trichomoniasis due to Tritrichomonas foetus [ 6 , 7 ] and campilobacteriosis due to Campylobacter foetus spp. [ 6 ]; inadequate nutritional programs [ 8 ] which revealed undernutrition and imbalanced nutrition; bull infertility [ 9 ], revealing the need to confirm a bull’s breeding soundness before introducing it for natural mating in a beef herd [ 10 ]; genetics, with some aspects of reproductive performance in beef cows proving more than 50% heritable [ 11 ] and inadequate animal welfare [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this result may vary with type of vaccine, viral strain in the vaccine and field, intensity of challenge, and animal immunity. A meta-analysis of 27 studies on the impact of BVDV vaccination indicated an approximate reduction in the risk of abortion of 45%; the authors recommended that vaccination of naturally infected heifers should be conducted with caution considering the economic impact (NEWCOMER et al, 2017a). Based on these results and those of our study, vaccination alone is not effective to control these diseases and associated reproductive losses.…”
Section: --------------------------------------------------------Prevmentioning
confidence: 56%