2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2012.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of false positive binding during immunofluorescence of Staphylococcus aureus infected tissue biopsies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the perennial problems researchers face when using this technique are false positives due to autofluorescence or non-specific antibody binding which, if not taken into account can lead to wrong conclusions (Baschong et al, 2001; True, 2008; Tan et al, 2012). Although no systematic studies of autofluorescence or non-specific staining of enamel were published, enamel researchers are generally aware of these issues and interpret immunofluorescence studies of amelogenesis with caution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the perennial problems researchers face when using this technique are false positives due to autofluorescence or non-specific antibody binding which, if not taken into account can lead to wrong conclusions (Baschong et al, 2001; True, 2008; Tan et al, 2012). Although no systematic studies of autofluorescence or non-specific staining of enamel were published, enamel researchers are generally aware of these issues and interpret immunofluorescence studies of amelogenesis with caution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%