2007
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.100776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of mental health problems: rationale for a universal approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, a 69% uptake on the basis of eligible birth records is high for population trials. 5 Non-participants' index of disadvantage scores were only marginally lower than those of participants, indicating that our results could be generalised to a wide socioeconomic spectrum, although perhaps not the lowest end. Secondly, we used well validated parent reported outcome measures appropriate to this age group.…”
Section: Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Firstly, a 69% uptake on the basis of eligible birth records is high for population trials. 5 Non-participants' index of disadvantage scores were only marginally lower than those of participants, indicating that our results could be generalised to a wide socioeconomic spectrum, although perhaps not the lowest end. Secondly, we used well validated parent reported outcome measures appropriate to this age group.…”
Section: Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Nevertheless, we successfully recruited many families with known risk factors for behavioural problems; 39% of the final sample were exposed to clinical levels of maternal depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms; substance misuse; partner conflict; social isolation; or financial problems. 5 Thirdly, although almost all families received some of the programme, only 49% received the full programme, underscoring the difficulty of implementing a true population prevention programme. If the parenting programme became part of routine primary care, the dosage received by families could conceivably increase (owing to streamlining and promotion of local sessions) but equally could further decrease.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…68,69 While reaching families at higher risk of alcohol misuse problems is important, accurate identification of such families is often challenging, and programmes targeted at families on the basis of risk may stigmatise attendance, thus affecting take-up. 70,71 Universal programmes are less likely than targeted interventions to deter parents, and, ideally, will reach families at higher risk from alcohol misuse while avoiding stigmatisation. Because alcohol consumption is a part of everyday life in the UK, a universal programme is relevant to everyone because they either drink alcohol themselves or are exposed to the effects of others' alcohol consumption.…”
Section: Community and Family Involvementmentioning
confidence: 99%