1975
DOI: 10.1056/nejm197505082921906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of Rh Hemolytic Disease — Ten Years' Clinical Experience with Rh Immune Globulin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interval is not based upon any fundamental immunological observation; in fact it relates to visiting arrangements in Sing-Sing prison where some of the early studies were performed on inmate volun teers! [7]. It seems unlikely that the im munological system does delay response to an antigen for 72 h or any other arbitrary period and therefore it is more appropriate to regard the success of anti-D treatment after feto-maternal haemorrhage as due to…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This interval is not based upon any fundamental immunological observation; in fact it relates to visiting arrangements in Sing-Sing prison where some of the early studies were performed on inmate volun teers! [7]. It seems unlikely that the im munological system does delay response to an antigen for 72 h or any other arbitrary period and therefore it is more appropriate to regard the success of anti-D treatment after feto-maternal haemorrhage as due to…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the BDMP during 1986, an estimated 157 cases (24.8%) of all RhHDN are likely to come in contact with the health care system. (2) Rh he¬ molytic disease of the newborn is rela¬ tively easy to diagnose with current technology. (3) An RhHDN-related di¬ agnosis is likely to be found in the medi¬ cal record during abstraction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(JAMA. 1991;265:3270-3274) Rh HEMOLYTIC disease of the new¬ born (RhHDN) is a serious and poten¬ tially fatal genetic condition.1 In 1968, Rh(D) immune globulin (Rhlg) became generally available as a public health measure for preventing perinatal mor¬ bidity and mortality due to RhHDN.2 About 90% of all cases of maternal Rh(D) sensitization and subsequent RhHDN would be eliminated if an ade¬ quate dose of Rhlg were administered to all Rh(D)-unsensitized Rh(D)-negative women pregnant with an Rh(D)-positive infant (1) after an induced or spontaneous abortion, (2) after an ectopic pregnancy, (3) after amniocentesis, (4) after antepartum placental hem¬ orrhage, (5) after transfusion of Rh(D)positive blood products, or (6) Data included in the BDMP are from all live-born and stillborn infants with diagnoses of any of 161 birth defects or genetic diseases before the first hospital discharge. Hospitals participating in the BDMP vary in size, are located throughout the United States, and are both privately and publicly owned.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prophylactic use of anti-Rh(D) antibody given at 28 weeks' gestation and within 72 h postpartum has result ed in the marked reduction of hemolytic disease of new born due to Rh(D) incompatibility [1,2], The coating and clearance of Rh(D)-positive fetal erythrocytes by admin istered anti-Rh(D) antibody prevents Rh immunization of the Rh(D)-negative mother. Failure of anti-Rh(D) pro phylaxis may be due to large fetomaternal transplacental hemorrhages, erroneous typing of the baby as Rh(D) negative or simply, failure to administer Rh-immune glob ulin [3],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%