DOI: 10.24124/2018/58757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of RhD alloimmunization in Northern British Columbia

Abstract: Despite best practice guidelines, international evidence suggests that the provision of anti-D prophylaxis to RhD negative pregnant women is suboptimal. Missing from the literature is research exploring the factors that perpetuate suboptimal care and continue to put RhD negative pregnant women at risk for RhD alloimmunization. The purpose of this study was to understand why RhD negative pregnant women continue to be at risk for RhD alloimmunization in northern BC. The specific research questions were: How do h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 125 publications
(317 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study presented in this article was part of a larger doctoral research project undertaken by the first author, T.M.F. 21 A qualitative applied health research approach, interpretive description, was used to guide the research project 22 and involved semistructured interviews with HCPs. An Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) approach was put in place and included a stakeholder committee with a membership of knowledge users, including a patient representative, decisionmakers, and HCPs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study presented in this article was part of a larger doctoral research project undertaken by the first author, T.M.F. 21 A qualitative applied health research approach, interpretive description, was used to guide the research project 22 and involved semistructured interviews with HCPs. An Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) approach was put in place and included a stakeholder committee with a membership of knowledge users, including a patient representative, decisionmakers, and HCPs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%